Metsker [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 1:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: RE: Integrator 30's vs. AB Stations
Neil,
Some thoughts on your questions
From reading the AB emails, it sounds
: Foxboro DCS Mail List/FONT
BRFONT SIZE=2Subject: RE: Integrator 30's vs. AB Stations/FONT
/P
BR
PFONT SIZE=2Re: PSS /FONT
/P
PFONT SIZE=2Check with your account rep or, you can get if from
www.csc.foxboro.com/FONT
BRFONT SIZE=2lt;A HREF=http://www.csc.foxboro.com;
TARGET=_blankhttp
On Wed May 3 17:20:05 2000 Johnson,Alex wrote...
To learn about Micro I/A check out the following PSSs or contact your
Account Rep. I really think that Micro I/A is a good way to go for
integrating the devices that it supports.
PSS 21H-6C6 B4:Micro-I/A Allen-Bradley PLC5/E Remote I/O
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Stan Brown [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Integrator 30's vs. AB Stations
On Wed May 3 17:20:05 2000 Johnson,Alex wrote
Stan,
We are using 6 AB Stations rather than Integrator 30s at my plant. I don't
have a basis for comparison, but I can certainly tell you a little about our
AB Stations.
The main reason to go with these for us was to keep setup fairly simple --
setup and continuing work on the stations is
You have really opened up a can of worms here, Stan.
We use Integrator 30s at our plant. They cause a lot of pain in both set up
and operator usage. The work is done in the PLC 5s and the I/A is used for
operator interface. The Basic Processing Cycle of the AB Gateways is 2
seconds. Our
On Wed May 3 11:21:27 2000 Jones, Charles R. (Chuck) wrote...
You have really opened up a can of worms here, Stan.
We use Integrator 30s at our plant. They cause a lot of pain in both set up
and operator usage. The work is done in the PLC 5s and the I/A is used for
operator interface. The
On Wed May 3 10:33:39 2000 Johnson,Alex wrote...
To integrate AB PLCs, we have the following options:
ABI30s - Serial I/F to ABDH, slowest option, optionally FT. No PLC
Integration blocks. No PID family blocks.
AB Station - PLC 5 only, better diagnostics, no redundancy, faster I/O
interface,
On Wed May 3 10:07:33 2000 Kevin FitzGerrell wrote...
Stan,
We are using 6 AB Stations rather than Integrator 30s at my plant. I don't
have a basis for comparison, but I can certainly tell you a little about our
AB Stations.
The main reason to go with these for us was to keep setup fairly
]
-Original Message-
From: Stan Brown [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Integrator 30's vs. AB Stations
On Wed May 3 10:33:39 2000 Johnson,Alex wrote
, 2000 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Integrator 30's vs. AB Stations
On Wed May 3 10:07:33 2000 Kevin FitzGerrell wrote...
Stan,
We are using 6 AB Stations rather than Integrator 30s at my plant.
I don't
have a basis
On Wed May 3 13:14:19 2000 Johnson,Alex wrote...
I'll try to clarify.
Thanks for the nice concise summary.
I geuss I am leaning in the direction of Integrator 30's at this point.
Kind of a big diapointment, since I know the limts of them pretty well,
and The
]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 3:22 PM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject:RE: Integrator 30's vs. AB Stations
A couple of other points to note with the ABstation
1. It is physically attached to the PLC-5. Therefore, although you
may engineer your
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 3:22 PM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject: RE: Integrator 30's vs. AB Stations
A couple of other points to note with the ABstation
1. It is physically attached to the PLC-5. Therefore, although you
may engineer your
]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 4:06 PM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject:RE: Integrator 30's vs. AB Stations
From: Timothy A. Ruhland
Based on some exchanges I have had with Charlie Piper, I think the
A-B
PLC5E interface is brand new
15 matches
Mail list logo
