I have some questions regarding porting of FPC to another machine type.
One of the things I am considering doing is the pushing of more of the
code processing onto the assembler, and whether this might be a better
idea, or if it was thought about and rejected for some reasons and it
might be
On 15 sep 2005, at 09:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, the idea is the IF, ELSE and ENDIF macros will handle the
creation
of the particular code for testing and such.
There are a number of (already written) macros available to do
this, and
I think it will reduce the complexity of the
I have some questions regarding porting of FPC to another machine type.
One of the things I am considering doing is the pushing of more of the
code processing onto the assembler, and whether this might be a better
idea, or if it was thought about and rejected for some reasons and it
might be
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Luiz Américo wrote:
I want just comment that any directory ending with pathdelim will return
false. See below:
DirectoryExists('C:\Windows'): TRUE
DirectoryExists('C:\Windows\'): FALSE
BTW: The fpc bugtracker is quite minimal, not allowing
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Marc Weustink wrote:
That is why the Lazarus team switched to mantis. Rewriting the
bugtracker would take also time. And it has also to be maintained.
Further rewriting wouldn't give all options we have with mantis now.
Setting it up consist merely of having a MySQL db
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Marc Weustink wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Luiz Américo wrote:
I want just comment that any directory ending with pathdelim will return
false. See below:
DirectoryExists('C:\Windows'): TRUE
DirectoryExists('C:\Windows\'): FALSE
BTW: The
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Marc Weustink wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Luiz Américo wrote:
I want just comment that any directory ending with pathdelim will
return
false. See below:
DirectoryExists('C:\Windows'): TRUE
Marc Weustink wrote:
Despite the fact that e.g. my account is still broken :)))
What is broken ?
I tried to reset my password because I forgot it (account name is FPK):
This account is protected. You are not allowed to access this until the account
protection is lifted.
Please use the
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Maybe, but none of the bug systems which I checked (bugzilla/mantis/others)
really satisfy.
Have a look at trac:
http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/
Now that looks much better, yes.
The wiki approach is a bit over the top for me, but for the
Marc Weustink wrote:
Anyhow, I've reset your account, you should have received an email.
It works now, thx :)
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Op Thu, 15 Sep 2005, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have some questions regarding porting of FPC to another machine type.
One of the things I am considering doing is the pushing of more of the
code processing onto the assembler, and whether this might be a better
idea, or if it was thought
11 matches
Mail list logo
