Re: [fpc-devel] debugging probelm

2006-03-16 Thread Peter Vreman
Hi! In Lazarus.when I debug a file. That is , the debugger stops and I look at the call stack, I cannot see filename and linenumber In other words, the debugging is made harder. I heard it was related to the freepascal compiler was not able to cooperate with gdb as the generated stack

Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.0 vs FPC 2.0.2 (div by zero)

2006-03-16 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 16 mrt 2006, at 03:22, Jose Manuel wrote: Math.SetExceptionMask([exDenormalized,exInvalidOp,exOverflow,e xPrecision,exUnderflow,exZeroDivide]); I do agree it's much polite and cross platform, but doesn't seem to work in Windows XP Pro (only tested in WinXP Pro SP2) with GL 3.2 and FPC

Re: [fpc-devel] debugging probelm

2006-03-16 Thread anteusz
Peter Vreman wrote: Hi! In Lazarus.when I debug a file. That is , the debugger stops and I look at the call stack, I cannot see filename and linenumber In other words, the debugging is made harder. I heard it was related to the freepascal compiler was not able to cooperate with gdb as the

[fpc-devel] FPC and OpenMP support.

2006-03-16 Thread Alexander Todorov
Hello to all, are there any parallel code developers in the list? I will have to work on a mixed mode parallel project using MPI and OpenMP. There are some bindings in pascal for the MPI library which is ok. Does fpc support OpenMP compiler directives? AFAIK no. Is there a known pascal compiler

Re: [fpc-devel] FPC and OpenMP support.

2006-03-16 Thread Daniƫl Mantione
Op Thu, 16 Mar 2006, schreef Alexander Todorov: Hello to all, are there any parallel code developers in the list? Yes. I will have to work on a mixed mode parallel project using MPI and OpenMP. There are some bindings in pascal for the MPI library which is ok. I have a proof of concept

RE: [fpc-devel] FPC 2.0.0 vs FPC 2.0.2 (div by zero)

2006-03-16 Thread Jose Manuel
Math.SetExceptionMask([exDenormalized,exInvalidOp,exOverflow,e xPrecision,exUnderflow,exZeroDivide]); [...] stand for it). Anyway using Set8087CW (which is indeed CPU dependant) does work under my equipment, SetExceptionMask doesn't. SetExceptionMask calls Set8087CW on x86, so if