Re: [fpc-devel] Is it possible to remove dependency on cygwin from freepascal ?

2009-04-29 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Bogusław Brandys schrieb: Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Bogusław Brandys said: Interesting.I have : D:\FPC\2.3.2\bin\i386-win32fpc -i Free Pascal Compiler version 2.3.1 Compiler Date : 2009/04/27 Compiler CPU Target: i386 and: D:\FPC\2.3.2\bin\i386-win32grep -i

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Is it possible to remove dependency on cygwin from freepascal ?

2009-04-29 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Daniël Mantione schrieb: Op Tue, 28 Apr 2009, schreef Vincent Snijders: Tomas Hajny schreef: On Tue, April 28, 2009 12:13, sakesun roykiatisak wrote: Is it possible to remove dependency on cygwin from freepascal ? To make it clear, I actually mean remove dependency on some cygwin

Re: [fpc-devel] Is it possible to remove dependency on cygwin from freepascal ?

2009-04-29 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: The IDE can be compiled with and without gdb. Releases typically have GDB, snapshots not. oops,sorry. That was my mistake. I always make new snapshot from SVN and copy missing files from last release (which is used to compile SVN trunk

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Is it possible to remove dependency on cygwin from freepascal ?

2009-04-29 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: mingw32. Did someone ever try to build a libgdb under mingw32? Yes, there is even a bug report discussing it (it doesn't work). (I quickly tried to duplicate that last weekend, but kept running into missing sys/ipc.h, even with mingw

Re: [fpc-devel] Is it possible to remove dependency on cygwin from freepascal ?

2009-04-29 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Marco van de Voort schrieb: In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: The IDE can be compiled with and without gdb. Releases typically have GDB, snapshots not. oops,sorry. That was my mistake. I always make new snapshot from SVN and copy missing files from last release (which is used

[fpc-devel] [patch] fpdoc.css now has definition list formatting

2009-04-29 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi, I wrote some CSS formatting for definition list tags for the fpdoc HTML output. This makes the dl, dt and dd tags look much better. Below is a before and after example. http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/sysutils/formatfloat.html vs

Re: [fpc-devel] [patch] fpdoc.css now has definition list formatting

2009-04-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi, I wrote some CSS formatting for definition list tags for the fpdoc HTML output. This makes the dl, dt and dd tags look much better. Below is a before and after example. http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/sysutils/formatfloat.html

Re: [fpc-devel] [patch] fpdoc.css now has definition list formatting

2009-04-29 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote: Could somebody please add the following CSS code to the end of the fpdoc.css file (that's if you prefer the new formatted definition lists). I'll adapt the file. Thanks Michael. The fpdoc.css file is

Re: [fpc-devel] [patch] fpdoc.css now has definition list formatting

2009-04-29 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Micha Nelissen mi...@neli.hopto.org wrote: The box around doesn't make much sense to me, now it seems like it's a separate entity while it is part of the paragraph/text. The reason I used a border is because it's a listing similar to what is used in articles or

[fpc-devel] bugreports

2009-04-29 Thread Bogusław Brandys
Can someone assign those bugreports : http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13499 and http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13518 to proper person ? Thanks Boguslaw ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org

Re: [fpc-devel] bugreports

2009-04-29 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 29 Apr 2009, at 14:38, Bogusław Brandys wrote: Can someone assign those bugreports : http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13499 and http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13518 to proper person ? In general, in FPC bug reports are not assigned to someone, but every developer for

Re: [fpc-devel] bugreports

2009-04-29 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 29 Apr 2009, at 14:46, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 29 Apr 2009, at 14:38, Bogusław Brandys wrote: Can someone assign those bugreports : http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13499 and http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13518 to proper person ? In general, in FPC bug reports are not

Re: [fpc-devel] bugreports

2009-04-29 Thread Bogusław Brandys
Jonas Maebe wrote: On 29 Apr 2009, at 14:46, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 29 Apr 2009, at 14:38, Bogusław Brandys wrote: Can someone assign those bugreports : http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13499 and http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13518 to proper person ? In general, in FPC bug

Re: [fpc-devel] bugreports

2009-04-29 Thread Micha Nelissen
Bogusław Brandys wrote: Can someone assign those bugreports : http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13499 and http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13518 to proper person ? You must first request to be added as developer before we can assign the bug to you ;-P. Micha

Re: [fpc-devel] bugreports

2009-04-29 Thread Bogusław Brandys
Micha Nelissen wrote: Bogusław Brandys wrote: Can someone assign those bugreports : http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13499 and http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13518 to proper person ? You must first request to be added as developer before we can assign the bug to you ;-P.

[fpc-devel] [patch][rfc] pangocairo bindings and some related questions

2009-04-29 Thread Martin Sucha
Hi, I've translated some C header files to be able to use pangocairo in my application. Preliminary patch that adds these bindings (and some missing things in pango and glib) is attached. Please review it ( comments requested :) ). My questions: 1. I've chosen to put pangocairo.pas into