Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-18 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: I have done so for years, with the existing tools, using the Makefiles. No changes were necessary. Can you explain that a bit more? I'm not a professional commandline user, perhaps I'm doing something stupid?

Re: [fpc-devel] New FPC JVM snapshot: Android support

2011-12-18 Thread Sven Barth
On 18.12.2011 00:01, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 17 Dec 2011, at 20:25, Sven Barth wrote: Btw: can it be that not all Makefiles have been regenerated? I issued a make clean with cpu and os set to jvm and android respectively and in $fpcdir/utils the process complained that jvm-android is not

[fpc-devel] Stack alignment on i386

2011-12-18 Thread Den Jean
Hi, to interface with c libraries containing SSE code, the stack must be aligned to 16 bytes. Currently the default -mpreferred-stack-boundary=num of gcc provides for this. However current fpc 2.4.4 does not align the stack as such. I do not know if this correct or not when reading things

Re: [fpc-devel] New FPC JVM snapshot: Android support

2011-12-18 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 18 Dec 2011, at 13:22, Sven Barth wrote: On 18.12.2011 00:01, Jonas Maebe wrote: Only the makefiles relevant to the JVM target have been regenerated. If make clean with CPU_TARGET=jvm tries to clean the utils directory, that's an error in the main Makefile I have to fix. Then

Re: [fpc-devel] Stack alignment on i386

2011-12-18 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 18 Dec 2011, at 13:37, Den Jean wrote: However current fpc 2.4.4 does not align the stack as such. I do not know if this correct or not when reading things like: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838#c8

Re: [fpc-devel] New FPC JVM snapshot: Android support

2011-12-18 Thread Maxim Ganetsky
18.12.2011 16:45, Jonas Maebe пишет: On 18 Dec 2011, at 13:22, Sven Barth wrote: On 18.12.2011 00:01, Jonas Maebe wrote: Only the makefiles relevant to the JVM target have been regenerated. If make clean with CPU_TARGET=jvm tries to clean the utils directory, that's an error in the main

Re: [fpc-devel] Stack alignment on i386

2011-12-18 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Jonas Maebe schrieb: However current fpc 2.4.4 does not align the stack as such. I do not know if this correct or not when reading things like: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838#c8 http://groups.google.com/group/ia32-abi/browse_thread/thread/4f9b3e5069943bf1 I tried to

Re: [fpc-devel] Stack alignment on i386

2011-12-18 Thread Den Jean
On Sunday 18 December 2011 14:05:00 Jonas Maebe wrote: That's because it changes the alignment of procedures (code), rather than that of the stack. You cannot change this setting via a switch, it's hardcoded in the compiler as part of the ABI. The problem is that gcc already changed this long

Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-18 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:06:21 +0100 Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote: Mattias Gaertner schrieb: On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:41:32 +0100 Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote: [...] The documentation related features could become Lazarus plug-ins, of course,

Re: [fpc-devel] MakeSkel and FPDoc projects

2011-12-18 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Mattias Gaertner schrieb: I understand that conflicts can arise, when the same XML file is modified by different means. But it is not nice when the IDE then crashes. Can you create a stacktrace? How? The IDE only disappears, silently, including the console window :-( DoDi

Re: [fpc-devel] Stack alignment on i386

2011-12-18 Thread zeljko
On Sunday 18 of December 2011 21:07:51 Den Jean wrote: The problem is that gcc already changed this long ago, and to interface with library binaries of a distribution (compiled by gcc), fpc does not provide an option. For the Qt binding I hope I solved it, so I am not in need of anything. How