On 12/24/2012 05:19 PM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
- Compile at least as fast as Delphi 7
IMHO hard to do for a portable system and not very important regarding
modern hardware. I only feel the linking stage is a viable goal here, as
in most cases the by far most of the already compiled units
On 12/25/2012 02:22 PM, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
What's the advantage in doing so? The code hangs around and does not
hurt in any way.
+1
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On 12/26/2012 11:43 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Do you have experiences with LLVM? Does it actually create great code?
Lets see what Embarcadero comes up with
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Great !
Thanks a lot.
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 01/05/2013 12:28 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Using whatever #xx#xx or #xx#xx#xx sequence represents the UTF-8
encoding of that character.
Sorry, I can't follow. Does #xx not just define a numerical
representation of an 8 bit entity ?
The interpretation in any code might be done later by any
On 01/05/2013 01:35 PM, Jy V wrote:
I do vote for UTF-8
-1
Regarding that conversions in the RTL (or LCL) are a rather seldom
runtime-task, GUI performance issues are not really necessary to be
considered.
Viable issues seem to be Delphi compatibility, backward compatibility,
usability,
Once upon a time, on 01/07/2013 12:39 PM to be precise, Michael Schnell
said:
On 01/05/2013 12:28 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Using whatever #xx#xx or #xx#xx#xx sequence represents the UTF-8
encoding of that character.
Sorry, I can't follow. Does #xx not just define a numerical
representation of
On 01/07/13 11:02, Michael Schnell wrote:
Lets see what Embarcadero comes up with
I wouldn't hold my breath. Based on recent Embarcadero history, the
first version would be absolute crap, second version might be beta
quality, 3rd version might not even exist (removed from product).
On Mon, January 7, 2013 13:28, Ewald wrote:
Once upon a time, on 01/07/2013 12:39 PM to be precise, Michael Schnell
said:
On 01/05/2013 12:28 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Using whatever #xx#xx or #xx#xx#xx sequence represents the UTF-8
encoding of that character.
Sorry, I can't follow. Does #xx
So the ambiguity with _filling_ a string with data in fact arises when
_not_ using the #nn notation :-) . With #nn the effect (i.e. the
resulting binary) is obvious.
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On 01/07/2013 02:01 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
(also just my understanding of what Jonas wrote)
I feel you are wrong. The string does not know about the code it's
content is to be interpreted in (other than with Delphi XE).
-Michael
___
fpc-devel
Once upon a time, on 01/07/2013 02:17 PM to be precise, Michael Schnell
said:
So the ambiguity with _filling_ a string with data in fact arises
when _not_ using the #nn notation :-) . With #nn the effect (i.e. the
resulting binary) is obvious.
Well, if there is literally the sequence $C7, $BE
On 5 January 2013 13:39, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:06:42 +
Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
It is obvious that Unicode is not a simple topic and among FPC/Lazarus
developers/contributors,I suspect that few if any at all, have a
On Mon, January 7, 2013 14:19, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/07/2013 02:01 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
(also just my understanding of what Jonas wrote)
I feel you are wrong. The string does not know about the code it's
content is to be interpreted in (other than with Delphi XE).
Sorry, your way of
Once upon a time, on 01/07/2013 05:05 PM to be precise, Tomas Hajny said:
On Mon, January 7, 2013 14:19, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/07/2013 02:01 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
(also just my understanding of what Jonas wrote)
I feel you are wrong. The string does not know about the code it's
Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Mon, January 7, 2013 13:28, Ewald wrote:
Once upon a time, on 01/07/2013 12:39 PM to be precise, Michael Schnell
said:
On 01/05/2013 12:28 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Using whatever #xx#xx or #xx#xx#xx sequence represents the UTF-8
encoding of that character.
Sorry, I can't
Hi,
this is very off-topic, no serious responses expected...
Everytime I read anything about strings here, this comes into my mind:
http://www.rigsofrods.com/entries/155-the-chaos-of-character-encodings
Strings seem to be a general problem for numeric machines :D
d.l.i.w
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Mon, January 7, 2013 13:28, Ewald wrote:
Once upon a time, on 01/07/2013 12:39 PM to be precise, Michael Schnell
said:
On 01/05/2013 12:28 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Using
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
but I fear we can not use that information for development with Free Pascal
because:
The string is represented internally as a Unicode string encoded as UTF-16.
Characters in the Basic Multilingual Plane (BMP) take 2 bytes, and characters
not in the BMP require 4
19 matches
Mail list logo
