On 07/02/2013 12:47 AM, Michel Catudal wrote:
I find smaller devices like the AVR32 and PIC32 more appropriate for embedded
system. ARM devices with Linux are more for use with video.
I don't see it that way at all.
IMHO, having a Linux OS is a great plus for embedded systems. This makes
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 07/02/2013 12:47 AM, Michel Catudal wrote:
I find smaller devices like the AVR32 and PIC32 more appropriate for
embedded system. ARM devices with Linux are more for use with video.
I don't see it that way at all.
IMHO, having a Linux OS is a great plus for embedded
Basically, this whole discussion is a bit pointless.
On 29-6-2013 19:28, Paul Breneman wrote:
On 06/29/2013 08:58 AM, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-06-21 03:32, Michael Schnell a écrit :
I don't understand why RPI (still) gets so much interest.
The point is that the RPi is a *coherent
On 07/02/2013 12:36 PM, Thaddy wrote:
Basically, this whole discussion is a bit pointless.
On 29-6-2013 19:28, Paul Breneman wrote:
On 06/29/2013 08:58 AM, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-06-21 03:32, Michael Schnell a écrit :
I don't understand why RPI (still) gets so much interest.
The
In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said:
That is exactly what I stated in the said contribution.
And of course this implies that it is not that well suited for embedded
use (which is my interest and the target of most forum members).
Any device whose I/O is not galvanically isolated
Hi,
Can this discussion about the pros and cons of various ARM-based
boards please be moved to fpc-devel? This discussion is completely
unrelated to developing FPC itself.
Thanks,
Jonas
FPC mailing lists admin
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Am 02.07.2013 13:52, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
Can this discussion about the pros and cons of various ARM-based
boards please be moved to fpc-devel? This discussion is completely
unrelated to developing FPC itself.
You mean to fpc-other or from fpc-devel, right? ;)
Regards,
Sven
On 02 Jul 2013, at 13:54, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 02.07.2013 13:52, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
Can this discussion about the pros and cons of various ARM-based
boards please be moved to fpc-devel? This discussion is completely
unrelated to developing FPC itself.
You mean to fpc-other or from
On 2-7-2013 13:52, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Hi,
Can this discussion about the pros and cons of various ARM-based
boards please be moved to fpc-devel? This discussion is completely
unrelated to developing FPC itself.
Thanks,
Jonas
FPC mailing lists admin
Hi all,
I'm a bit unfamiliar with the packages build system, and was
wondering how to add 'openal' for example, to the win64 list for SVN FPC
building? I would like the openal package to be compiled when I compile
for win64. I would have thought by adding it to Makefile.fpc.fpcmake,
it
Hi all,
Nevermind, looked in the sources, and learnt more about the FPMake
system. I kinda like it, beats Makefiles for sure. Just thought there
was an automatic way to build the fpmake.pp in each directory based on
other 'spec' files, but it appears not, so I just edited the fpmake.pp
Le 2013-07-02 07:37, Marco van de Voort a écrit :
In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said:
That is exactly what I stated in the said contribution.
And of course this implies that it is not that well suited for embedded
use (which is my interest and the target of most forum members).
Le 2013-07-02 07:52, Jonas Maebe a écrit :
Hi,
Can this discussion about the pros and cons of various ARM-based boards
please be moved to fpc-devel? This discussion is completely unrelated to
developing FPC itself.
Thanks,
Jonas
FPC mailing lists admin
OK
--
For Linux Software
13 matches
Mail list logo
