On 07.12.2019 21:39, Sven Barth wrote:
I'm arguing that there is no builtin way to *access* the parameters passed in
such a way.
You are arguing that /now/, but it is not what you said earlier. You said,
verbatim:
one can not access VarArgs parameters inside a Delphi function (without
Am 07.12.2019 um 14:31 schrieb bla...@blaise.ru:
your argument with VarArgs does not count either: one can not access
VarArgs parameters inside a Delphi function (without resorting to
assembly)
Again, you are misinformed.
I understand that you may not use DCC as much or at all, but you have
Dear All,
Looking at t_linux.pas, this code is common (also for other system
files):
if (isdll) then
begin
Add('INPUT(');
Add(sysrootpath+info.DynamicLinker);
Add(')');
end;
And also:
if libraryadded and not(linklibc) and not(isdll) and
(tf_section_threadvars in
On 07.12.2019 14:21, Sven Barth wrote:
I stand by my point that the combination of anonymous function variables with
calling conventions and cblocks occurs very, very seldomly.
I am not necessarily disputing that point, I am disputing your design decision,
which was misinformed, but you
On Sat, 7 Dec 2019, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 07.12.2019 um 10:28 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
If there is a consensus that this is a blocker, I am ready to do the
work ASAP. provided we select the syntax. Personally, I am inclined
towards these three:
type M = procedure (const N:
Am 07.12.2019 um 10:28 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
If there is a consensus that this is a blocker, I am ready to do the
work ASAP. provided we select the syntax. Personally, I am inclined
towards these three:
type M = procedure (const N: Integer) with var;
type M = procedure (const N:
Am 07.12.2019 um 01:00 schrieb bla...@blaise.ru:
Beforehand, to provide a context, here are some excerpts from private
correspondence:
On 11.12.2016 22:00:37 +0300, bla...@blaise.ru wrote in
1c51a35a-bbbc-c99d-232f-0bf6529df...@blaise.ru:
my progress thus far
9) Method reference directives
On 2019-12-07 01:00, bla...@blaise.ru wrote:
3) My first example back in 2016 intentionally featured a valid use
case: CDECL is crucial for VARARGS. (Somehow, not only that case, but
the whole point that DCC accepts calling conventions went unnoticed.)
I indeed did not know that.
I wonder
On Sat, 7 Dec 2019, bla...@blaise.ru wrote:
Beforehand, to provide a context, here are some excerpts from private
correspondence:
If there is a consensus that this is a blocker, I am ready to do the work
ASAP. provided we select the syntax. Personally, I am inclined towards these
three:
