While working on the lazarus GUI I could not find evidence that fppkg is
capable of supporting multiple repositories. As far as I can tell the
mirrors.xml is always downloaded from the freepascal server and only holds some
alternatives to get the packages from.
I think it would be a nice
On May 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
While working on the lazarus GUI I could not find evidence that fppkg is
capable of supporting multiple repositories. As far as I can tell the
mirrors.xml is always downloaded from
On May 14, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 13:18 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
All this info
On May 10, 2011, at 9:07 AM, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2011 08:30:28 +0200 (CEST), Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
Hi,
I've created a trivial front end for fppkg (see lazarus
On May 13, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
All this info is supposed to be output in XML format from fpmake
--manifest. fppkg picks it up and stores it in the repository.
If you want to extend it to include a category
Hi,
I've created a trivial front end for fppkg (see lazarus mailing list) but
working on this I realized that they are not grouped in any way. Currently with
approx. 70 packages this is not a real problem, but if the system will get used
more widely it will be impossible to deduct the purpose
On Mar 31, 2011, at 9:22 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
Imagine you have debug, profiling and testing setup locally b
Should be debug, release and testing
Nono, I actually meant profiling as different from debug. The difference
Hi,
I'm using fpmake more and more in my projects (large or small) and from time to
time I come across some limitations that need to be resolved. In the past I
have supplied a number of small patches which were normally applied without
problems, but sometimes I was sent back (mostly with good
On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:31 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
- managing debug/release builds (also cross-compiling)
What is failing in the current system for this ?
I was thinking to be able to do something like :
fpmake build debug
This will add some debug options to the build process.
On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:46 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 30.03.2011 17:31, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
- execute fpmake from command line (see thread by mattias : run
pascal programs as script) for this we would need
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:29 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
- managing debug/release builds (also cross-compiling)
What is failing in the current system for this ?
I was thinking to be able to do something like :
fpmake build debug
This will add some debug options to the build process.
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I don't think this is needed/wanted. fpmake.pp is intended to be used in
tandem with fppkg, and that looks for a fpmake.pp program, not a script.
For FPC yes, but for standalone projects this is not the case as you
mentioned. Apart
On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
fpmake build debug
I would prefer a named option, i.e.
fpmake build --profile=debug
from the users perspective this is not very friendly.
It is more clear what is meant. All other options are also specified with a
--option
I
(not to mention all the possible complications on Windows, probably Mac
OS as well)
Can you name a potential issue you see by renaming the makefile to some
other extension? I thought that FPC does not mind which extension you use,
as long as the syntax is correct?
It does not mind.
Imagine you have debug, profiling and testing setup locally b
Should be debug, release and testing
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Resolved in revision 2521. I added your example to the test suite.
Darius
On Jan 12, 2011, at 7:13 AM, Alex Shishkin wrote:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18471
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Should I create a bug report for this?
Regards, Darius
On Dec 16, 2010, at 1:26 AM, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
IMHO there is a bug in TFreeTypeFont.SetFlags. The check that determines
if the inherited method should be called seems to be wrong. Can someone
confirm? Please consider the following
On Jan 2, 2011, at 1:19 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Hi,
I've been making a small util that loads revisions to merge from a branch
(in my cases fixes_2_4), gets the logs, and sort the revisions into sets of
a common topic (to filter out objc and other major stuff that is not mergable)
IMHO there is a bug in TFreeTypeFont.SetFlags. The check that determines
if the inherited method should be called seems to be wrong. Can someone
confirm? Please consider the following patch:
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
procedure TFreeTypeFont.SetFlags (index:integer; AValue:boolean);
begin
- if not
I did the unthinkable ;) by trying to write some documentation for an
FPC package. I searched FPC without success after which I got fpcdocs
from SVN, no luck either. I only found some files included in Lazarus
(\docs\xml\).
What is the plan for the lack of documentation on packages? Should I add
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:39 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Contributions are more than welcome, as long as they adhere to a strict
rule: I don't publish documentation for a unit unless it is complete.
Does that mean that partial documented xml files are allowed to be added
to SVN, but that
I created a new patch for fpmake. It will now compile example programs
as well.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18151
I also have a question regarding an idea I have for resource files. I
already have made a preliminary patch (not published yet) to use rstconv
to compile .rst files into
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 18:04 +0100, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 18:05 +0100, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
I have created a patch for fpmake that hides some of the raw compiler
output. The new output looks more like scons and is actually more clear
imho. You can however still
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:31 +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29 Nov 2010, at 18:45, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
The major problem we will have to solve is localization. Now the code
depends on the words Compiling and linking. Is there a way to
circumvent this?
If you pass -vq to the compiler
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 20:00 +0100, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:31 +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29 Nov 2010, at 18:45, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
The major problem we will have to solve is localization. Now the code
depends on the words Compiling and linking
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 16:01 +0100, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
Hi,
Today I was playing with FPDoc and I decided to add creating the
documents as a target to fpmake which seems logical to me. I only did
a very basic implementation to show tghe principle so someone (Joost /
Michael??)
I've been thinking about the folder structure for fpdoc xml files.
Analog to bin and example files I would like to have the xml files in
the default location called fpdoc. The output will be sent to the folder
called docs. From where they can be installed. Of course the locations
should
I've been thinking about the folder structure for fpdoc xml files.
Analog to bin and example files I would like to have the xml files in
the default location called fpdoc. The output will be sent to the folder
called docs. From where they can be installed. Of course the locations
should
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 22:17 +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
On 27.11.2010 22:10, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
Well, fpmake contains the dependencies of the units.
Therefor you should be able to place the units in the correct order.
So my idea would be to enforce the order by looking at the dependencies
You already know from here that 'classes.pp' depends on those units, so
you might use those already defined dependencies to automatically add
those units to fpdoc as well (I don't know how exactly you can and need
to do it, but that's the theory) if you want to generate the
- Selection of output format ?
- Add to zip ?
I created a new patch that implements these options. Can someone please
review the patch and comment on it. Are there any other frequently used
settings or conditions regarding fpdoc that should be taken in the
patch? I'm happy to apply them.
I've posted a patch for pscanner. Could someone please review and
comment or apply?
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17465
TIA, Darius
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 22:51 +0300, Žilvinas Ledas wrote:
Tried sample project today. Some a comment and a question:
1) I have a strange error when the same file is modified twice (and
afterwards restored twice). One is:
I'm looking at this issue atm. As soon as I have a definite solution I
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 23:31 +0200, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 22:51 +0300, Žilvinas Ledas wrote:
Tried sample project today. Some a comment and a question:
1) I have a strange error when the same file is modified twice (and
afterwards restored twice). One is:
I'm looking
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 14:38 +0100, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Andrew Haines schreef:
?
AFAIK, it is not. I think we should consider adding it to lazarus/components
or
lazarus/components/lhelp, to support loading html files from internet with
http in
lhelp.
It's strange to not be
Hi Vojtěch,
First, I would like to point you that you have to send your Lazarus
questions to the Lazarus mailinglist and not to the FPC-devel please.
Having that said,
1, I have no text on BitmapButtons in Lazarus in DialogBoxes (except
Open/Save file). There are only small icons on it. I
2, When I write procedure or function with parameter String[31] it
doesn't work. It writes Forward declaration not solved, however it is.
Please provide a minimal example. You probably have some syntax problem.
What you would like to do in this case is to declare a custom type:
37 matches
Mail list logo
