27.11.2011 0:41, Leonardo M. Ramé пишет:
This is the output I get after update:
...
Well, now ppc2.exe at least starts.
Can you further try to build with OPT=-dDISABLE_TLS_DIRECTORY ?
But don't execute 'make clean all OPT=-dDISABLE_TLS_DIRECTORY' at the top-level directory, as in
this case
27.11.2011 13:09, Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 27 Nov 2011, at 12:05, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
But don't execute 'make clean all OPT=-dDISABLE_TLS_DIRECTORY' at the top-level
directory, as in this case OPT is apparently ignored.
I regularly use OPT at the top level myself and I've never seen
27.11.2011 13:26, Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 27 Nov 2011, at 12:19, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
27.11.2011 13:09, Jonas Maebe пишет:
I regularly use OPT at the top level myself and I've never seen it being
ignored in that situation.
Earlier in this thread Leonardo wrote:
Sven, I added OPT=-gl
27.11.2011 16:45, Leonardo M. Ramé пишет:
Well, I found I had an e:\pp directory containing an fpc 2.5.1, and my PATH was
pointing to it, so my previous tests could have been influenced by some files
from that directory.
After deleting it, I compiled from top level directory using:
27.11.2011 19:10, Sven Barth пишет:
On 27.11.2011 16:45, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
The fact it works with DISABLE_TLS_DIRECTORY and fails otherwise
suggests that the foreign thread raises exceptions and FPC tries to
handle them. Error 255 is most likely caused by Halt(255) in
rtl/inc/except.inc
26.11.2011 21:40, Sven Barth пишет:
On 26.11.2011 19:50, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
26.11.2011 17:18, Leonardo M. Ramé пишет:
$0040C776 is systhrd.inc line 125 if TLSKey=$ then RunError(226)
$0040FB59 is syswin.inc line 356, DLL_THREAD_ATTACH branch of
exec_tls_callback
This is TLS
26.11.2011 23:10, Leonardo M. Ramé пишет:
This machine is running Win2003 32bits as Guest on VirtualBox 4.1.2 on Ubuntu
11.10 x86_64. On Windows it is not running any antivirus and I enabled only the
default services, disabled firewall/updates/antivirus/etc.
I did a test with processexplorer
25.11.2011 13:36, Michael Müller пишет:
Hi,
I tested RC1 using one of my codes and ran into an internal error. I was able
to reduce the code to the following.
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.0rc1 [2011/10/15] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-2011 by Florian Klaempfl and others
Target OS: Win32
24.11.2011 21:48, Florian Klämpfl пишет:
Am 24.11.2011 14:59, schrieb Sergei Gorelkin:
Hello,
There are some differences between FPC and Delphi exception handling
(working on SEH support, one would inevitably collect all of them):
1) Delphi uses EZeroDivide for floating-point division by zero
25.11.2011 15:49, Sergei Gorelkin пишет:
The error is at the beginning of SetArray() call.
I guess this one is for me to fix.
Fixed in r19684.
If possible, please consider merging the fix to 2.6.
Regards,
Sergei
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc
25.11.2011 21:00, Tomas Hajny пишет:
Isn't the fact that it's missing in i386-linux RTL more an omission of the
respective platform maintainer rather than a hint that it might be
specific to Windows (and specifically to old Windows)?
Extending my previous comment after digging a bit more:
Hello,
There are some differences between FPC and Delphi exception handling (working on SEH support, one
would inevitably collect all of them):
1) Delphi uses EZeroDivide for floating-point division by zero, while FPC uses EDivByZero (the same
exception class is used for integer division by
Hello,
Currently compiler can place an array of const or open array parameter into register. Moreover, if
such parameter is passed by value, a local copy is made on heap (except for i386 with non-fixed
stack where a copy is made on stack).
A local copy on heap must be disposed in 'finally'
20.11.2011 23:38, Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 20 Nov 2011, at 21:18, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Sorry, I meant recordalignmin.
And I didn't think of that setting. Yes, that should indeed work.
It doesn't, {$codealign recordnmin} changes only alignment of fields within the record, not
alignment of
Hello,
Is it possible to declare a (SSE friendly) record or array type, so that local variables of this
type get aligned to e.g. 16 bytes? Target is x86_64 with aligned stack.
The {$codealign localmin=16} directive seems to work, but it is an ugly
solution because:
- it must be effective at
19.11.2011 14:14, Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 19 Nov 2011, at 11:31, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
Is it possible to declare a (SSE friendly) record or array type, so that local
variables of this type get aligned to e.g. 16 bytes?
I don't think so. For this, we'd probably need a separate vector type
09.11.2011 22:58, Helmut Hartl пишет:
My (quick) deduction from the output below was that somewhow the initialisation
of the memory
managment for the new thread gone bad, as the crash seems to be in the new
thread.
Hence I changed the memorymanager to cmem and the problem goes away, now our
19.10.2011 17:45, Graeme Geldenhuys пишет:
Not that I understand much of the assembler generated, but what I did
notice is that Delphi XE2 64-bit uses the MOVAPD function (introduced in
SSE2 [1]), but even if I specify -O3 -CfSSE3 with 64-bit FPC, FPC only
uses the MOVSD (introduced in 386
23.09.2011 5:52, Andrew Brunner пишет:
I use latest FPC from /trunk/ and this problem just started happening recently.
...
Posting to the MySQL 5.1 database : the field size is as expected.
Retrieving /converting the list (asString) from the database with all
values set to small numbers appears
09.09.2011 18:36, Martin пишет:
fpc recently added the ability to translate
const Foo: String = resourcestring;
if resourcestring changes so does Foo
Any way to work around this?
Probably only by duplicating the literal value which is used to initialize.
because in
11.06.2011 2:26, Ralf A. Quint пишет:
Sorry, but you're wrong. Windows (actually since the days of DOS) happily
accepts a forward slash in
a path:
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Ralfcd /windows
C:\Documents and
11.06.2011 3:13, Martin пишет:
On 11/06/2011 00:08, Martin wrote:
Yes, thanks it is fixed (well, or I cant reach i du to the below, but I choose
to believe in it's
fixed).
But now (with today's SVN), on w32 vista:
make clean
make.exe all LINKSMART=1 CREATESMART=1 DEBUG=1 OPTIMIZE=0 OPT=-gl
02.06.2011 19:49, Sven Barth пишет:
Maybe it's better if you or someone else would try to improve the performance
of the i386 assembler
code that makes up the Compare(Byte/Word/DWord) functions (it's located in
rtl/i386/i386.inc btw).
I tend to agree. The string instructions used there (rep
30.05.2011 11:26, Martin Schreiber пишет:
Interesting the big difference in data size.
It is explainable: Delphi 7 puts good half of data into the code section (procedure-local data,
string data, class vmt's are all there). FPC separates data from code completely.
Sergei
16.04.2011 11:39, zeljko пишет:
Any hints ?
The {$J+} switch must be applied to the declaration of constants, not to their
usage.
Sergei
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
12.04.2011 16:18, LacaK пишет:
I have attached minor rearangement, consider them please
Will do. It's possible to go even further and completely exclude finalization
and try..finally
block, because the intermediate Variant is always of type Double, which doesn't
need finalization.
See
15.04.2011 9:20, LacaK пишет:
Hi Sergei,
Sorry for the delay, got stuck with other issues... Applied in r17319. Thank
you for the patch!
It is ok ;-)
Thanks.
Could I ask why is there needed VarDataInit ? (only for my interest ;-))
A good question. Formally it is not needed, but in general
10.04.2011 00:49, Florian Klämpfl пишет:
Am 09.04.2011 22:22, schrieb Sergei Gorelkin:
09.04.2011 23:10, Florian Klämpfl пишет:
Problem is, this might hurt non leaf functions. Maybe the register
allocators can be initialized differently for leave and non-leave
functions?
I understand
AFAIK every 64-bit capable x86 has at least SSE2 available, so SSE2 code is safe to be the default
one (while code for SSE3 and higher requires CPUID checks).
Still, I want to confirm.
Sergei
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Hello,
I wonder whether it is possible to assign a priority (or order) of registers for FPC's register
allocator. Currently registers are allocated in the order of ordinals defined in cpubase.pas. On
i386 it doesn't make any difference, but on x86_64 'nonvolatile' rbx (and in Win64 also rsi
09.04.2011 22:26, Sergei Gorelkin пишет:
09.04.2011 22:13, Jonas Maebe пишет:
Simply changing the register order in the array to trgcpu.create in
Tcgx86_64.init_register_allocators should do it.
Hmm, that was the first thing I tried, but it doesnt't seem to make any
difference
09.04.2011 22:15, Florian Klämpfl пишет:
The registers are allocated in the order defined in
tcgx86_64.init_registers_allocators. However, there are rax etc. in
front of rbx etc. The reason why rbx etc. are used might be calls to
other procedures. Can you give an example which is affected by
09.04.2011 23:10, Florian Klämpfl пишет:
Problem is, this might hurt non leaf functions. Maybe the register
allocators can be initialized differently for leave and non-leave functions?
I understand the concern, but it should be handled somehow already. If we consider a non-leaf
function that
02.04.2011 1:15, Joost van der Sluis пишет:
Hi all,
I've just committed a change in the Makefiles for the fcl-web package.
The Makefile now calls fpmake to build and install the package.
Another disaster occurs when I try to use the same source tree from different
OSes.
Say first I build in
06.04.2011 12:56, Joost van der Sluis пишет:
Another disaster occurs when I try to use the same source tree from different
OSes.
Say first I build in Linux, it successfully creates the
'/packages/fcl-web/fpmake' executable. After
that building from Windows fails since it attempts to run the
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara пишет:
So, what should be done?
1) Be totally compatible with Delphi: convert date to string with
hardcoded format and raise exception when doing the conversion back?
2) Use the hardcoded format used to convert from vardate variant to
string and vice versa?
3) Use
On 02.04.2011 01:15, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
I've just committed a change in the Makefiles for the fcl-web package.
The Makefile now calls fpmake to build and install the package.
I'm unable to run the test suite with this change, apparently it tries to install package files to
LacaK пишет:
I have attached minor rearangement, consider them please
Will do. It's possible to go even further and completely exclude finalization and try..finally
block, because the intermediate Variant is always of type Double, which doesn't need finalization.
I have looked again at
LacaK пишет:
I can fix it by following fixs:
1. fmtbcd_castto.diff ... added case when castto varString is requested
... then do not use cast throught varDouble (to avoid lost of
precision), but convert directly from TBCD to string
2. variants.pp ... here we must add handling of
LacaK пишет:
Hi Sergei,
I can fix it by following fixs:
1. fmtbcd_castto.diff ... added case when castto varString is
requested ... then do not use cast throught varDouble (to avoid lost
of precision), but convert directly from TBCD to string
2. variants.pp ... here we must add handling
Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 01 Mar 2011, at 07:32, Paul Ishenin wrote:
I noticed today that if I want to allocate 0 bytes I get not a nil but
a valid pointer. Why?
The current code that causes this comes from this (cvs) revision:
revision 1.16
date: 1999-09-17 19:14:12 +0200; author: peter;
Martin пишет:
Never used variants much.
But the below compiles, and then gives a SigSegV (w32).
Is that to be expected? Or ?
program Project1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
uses
Classes;
procedure Foo(v1,v2: Variant; constref v3,v4: Variant);
begin
writeln(v1,v2,v3,v4);
end;
begin
Max Vlasov пишет:
Speaking of new features, I remember the bunch of them were introduced
with Delphi 1.0 and many of them were inspired by other languages and
dialects. I admit that frequent implementing of features like the one I
suggested will make fpc more experimental and less solid.
Max Vlasov пишет:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Max Vlasov max.vla...@gmail.com
mailto:max.vla...@gmail.com wrote:
An idea here is to introduce a directive (maybe something else, but
directive looks more straightforward), let's call it readonly that
forces the method to be
Andrew Brunner пишет:
Ok.
First off tag should be revised to match Delphi.
Second. I need data property on Tcomponent
I propose having an additional directive for this mechanism kind of like the
option for using large strings. Components have data property. This way I can
just get
Sven Barth пишет:
Hello together!
While getting SysUtils and Classes to compile for Native NT I've
stumbled upon some more spots where Handle=LongInt/LongWord is assumed.
1. In objpas/sysutils/filutilh.inc and its implementation
objpas/sysutils/fina.inc the GetFileHandle functions are
Marco van de Voort пишет:
In our previous episode, Sergei Gorelkin said:
2. THandleStream has a field FHandle which is defined as Integer. Now
this handle is filled either by the constructor which takes an Integer
as well or by e.g. TFileStream which gets its handle from
FileOpen/FileCreate
Hello,
Two questions I wanted to ask:
1) There are two variant type defintions (varxxx constants): one in compiler/symdef.pas, another one
in rtl/inc/varianth.inc. Worse, they are out of sync. Is it really necessary to have a separate set
of these definitions in compiler?
2) In FPC,
Florian Klaempfl пишет:
Am 11.11.2010 15:19, schrieb Sergei Gorelkin:
Hello,
Two questions I wanted to ask:
1) There are two variant type defintions (varxxx constants): one in
compiler/symdef.pas, another one in rtl/inc/varianth.inc. Worse, they
are out of sync. Is it really necessary to have
Sven Barth пишет:
Hello together!
As you might have noticed, I'm working on the NativeNT RTL again and
discover some nice FPC_HAS_FEATURE_* and THandle problems on the way.
Now I've found another one and I'd like to know how this should be fixed:
FileSetDate in SysUtils (the filename
Sergei Gorelkin пишет:
According to Delphi documentation, it should return zero on success,
non-zero error code otherwise.
Windows handle-based implementation conforms to that. The proper fix
would be returning value of GetLastOSError, but it may be not available
for all platforms.
Fixed
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho пишет:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Dariusz Mazur dar...@emadar.com wrote:
I say wrong: how to change code page used to implicit conversion
ansistring- wide string
Use the appropriate conversion routine instead, and avoid implicit
conversions for they are not
dar...@emadar.com пишет:
When I using xmlCfg unit i found problem with storing literals in
arbitrary code page. XMLCfg perform automatic conversion with omit some
chars.
I've change it to use utf8string instead of. Maybe this patch will be
interesting.
Such patch will make all existing config
zeljko пишет:
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 15:13, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:14 PM, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
No, I've opened an issue and Jonas closed with good explanation - we had
misusage of IntersectRect in gtk/gtk2 interfaces (I've fixed both) ...
Jonas Maebe пишет:
With a little testing, here are two facts:
1) Delphi 7 also shows this bug.
2) Windows.IntersectRect() does not show it, allowing 'misuses'.
So, whoever wrote the FPC function, must have been trying really hard
to achieve bug-to-bug compatibility with Delphi... or simply
Willibald Krenn wrote:
Am 26.10.2010 21:33, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
Thanks for confirming my thoughts. Shall I still file a bugreport for
this?
It's fixed.
Thanks, I just wanted to file a report for this and the assembly thing
but it seems that reporting new issues on mantis does not work
Hans-Peter Diettrich пишет:
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
PChars, on the other hand, require manual memory management
which is the source of bugs.
Point out the example of bugs. (ones that matter, not the stylistic ones)
The usage of PString essentially is using an crippled AnsiString,
Alexander Klenin пишет:
Ok, I re-tested with 2*10^6 Find's. Then AnsiString variants wins even
for length 5:
ShortString: 0.547 s
AnsiString: 0.437 s
Running the test, I get quite opposite results:
0.750 sec
0.766 sec
short add: 1.829 sec
short find: 0.781 sec
ansi add: 1.750 sec
ansi
Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 20 Oct 2010, at 13:37, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Can you please enter a bug-report for this, and simply mention these facts ?
- Fix as suggested in Delphi mode
- Prohibit in ObjFPC mode ?
Prohibiting it breaks the compilation of dom_html.pp:
dom_html.pp(66,14) Error:
Alexander Klenin пишет:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 00:03, Sergei Gorelkin sergei_gorel...@mail.ru wrote:
Alexander Klenin пишет:
Running the test, I get quite opposite results:
0.750 sec
0.766 sec
short add: 1.829 sec
short find: 0.781 sec
ansi add: 1.750 sec
ansi find: 1.406 sec
The only
Alexander Klenin пишет:
Ok, I went ahead and have taken look at the code.
I assume you speak about TFPHashList vs TFPCustomHashTable.
The classes are not really comparable, because they use quite
different internal data structures.
So instead I converted TFPHashList list to use ansistrings.
Michael Van Canneyt пишет:
I believe it's not ShortStrings per se to blame, but storing them in a
large single memory block as it is being done in TFPHashList. Adding a
lot of keys will cause many reallocations. Large size of the block
forces memory manager to use variable-size pool, which
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
The current hierarchy in the dom unit is as follows
TDomNode
|
TDOMNode_WithChildren
|
TDOMDocument
Now the GetTextContent() implementation for TDOMNode_WithChildren runs
recursively through all child nodes collecting data.
...but the
Martin Schreiber пишет:
Truncated at line 16380:
Delphi 7:
E:\FPC\svn\fixes_2_4\tests\webtbfdcc32 tw2242xtrunc.pp
Borland Delphi Version 15.0
Copyright (c) 1983,2002 Borland Software Corporation
tw2242xtrunc.pp(16382)
16383 lines, 0.16 seconds, 256684 bytes code, 1801 bytes data.
FPC:
Jonas Maebe пишет:
On 11 Sep 2010, at 12:23, Martin Schreiber wrote:
or it isn't true that FPC bottleneck is disk IO. Are we absolutely sure about
the bottleneck?
I'm quite certain that there are many reasons that FPC compiles more slowly than Delphi.
The bottlenecks probably also vary from
Michael Van Canneyt пишет:
One idea that comes at this point is to put PPU data directly into
object files, so the number of output files is reduced plain twice.
The PPU data could be placed into a section that is ignored by linker.
However I don't know is this is possible for all
Daniël Mantione пишет:
Op Fri, 10 Sep 2010, schreef Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Sergei Gorelkin schrieb:
When dynamic strings are used all around, is the use of pointers to
ShortString still recommended? (fmodule contains a lot of them)
Whenever you care about performance, you'll quickly
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
When dynamic strings are used all around, is the use of pointers to
ShortString still recommended? (fmodule contains a lot of them)
Whenever you care about performance, you'll quickly realize that dynamic strings are plain
inappropriate. When it is also known that
Graeme Geldenhuys пишет:
This limitation makes FPCUnit, DUnit2 and fpprofiler under 64-bit platforms
pretty useless. :-(
Well, I don't know about DUnit2 and fpprofiler, but FPCUnit is currently hardcoded to use LineInfo -
so it won't display anything if actual type of debug information is
Joost van der Sluis пишет:
...
I don't know what's the best way to fix this.
I see three solutions:
1: replace the 'call' in the wrapper with a 'jmp'. I've tried this and
it works, but when the function returns, the 'self'-class-pointer is not
converted to the interface-pointer. But I don't
Hello,
I have discovered that the pointer returned by typeinfo() builtin in FPC is very different from one
returned in Delphi. What Delphi returns points to rough equivalent of FPC's INIT$_typename
structure, so one may examine the structure to figure out the 'managed' fields. FPC, however,
Michael Schnell wrote:
...
This is essentially the same code as with Delphi. Supposedly as with
Delphi [__tls_index (417328h) ] is always 0 with normal applications.
(no idea what this is useful for)
The TLS index is allocated by a call to TlsAlloc at application startup. It will be zero for
Martin пишет:
Anyone any idea, if there s any code that could cause such an
optimization ?
This is by design. 'const' modifier on ansistring and other 'managed' type arguments instucts the
compiler to omit refcount changes, yielding a faster code. At the same time it prohibits direct
Martin wrote:
I saw the error in my thinking, after Jonas (re-) explained the meaning
of const.
and I guess it applies to other types to (as long as they are passed by
reference): e.g records are likely to see changes too...
Indeed. I was initially not completely correct, and should have
Michael Schnell wrote:
I did not take a look at FPC's memory manager. Maybe someone might want
to do some profiling
I did the extensive profiling when working on fcl-xml package. For a single-threaded application,
the following is true:
- FastMM is somewhat slower than FPC's memory
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
But the patches have been rejected? For what reason?
They have been applied in revision 9297.
Regards,
Sergei
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Not necessarily. When all currently used files reside in memory, every
(recorded) token can contain an pointer (or offset) into the file
buffer. This may reduce the number of required string copies (not yet
fully researched).
You normally shouldn't ever need to
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
IMO compiler messages slow down compilation a lot.
How do you know this, did you benchmark or is it just your opinion?
Common knowledge, proved by experience.
I had benchmarked that, and submitted some patching some (already long)
Marco van de Voort wrote:
I don't understand this, since if I follow these steps, the stored nodes
still may contain the wiki syntax, and thus need backend changes?
Or am I wrong and are you suggesting encoding the xml/html to wiki as much as
possible before editing, and decoding it to
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Obviously...
And:
Not using XML would require a major rewrite of fpdoc - it is deeply rooted
in XML, as you'll find out - and I am not very keen on this. So hold your
horses there, please...
I'd suggest the following:
1) XML stays :-)
2) The fpdoc is modified in
Martin wrote:
I am still stuck on this issue.
I don't know if fpc_reraise has been entered while it should not; or if
the data was corrupted.
Normally you should be able to figure it out by examining the call
stack/backtrace.
What does FRAMETYPE = 1 mean?
Guess it is the value of
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Because many of the classes we want to observe descend from
TPersistent. So it make sense to put the basic workings of Observer
there, and then descendant components will decided what must trigger
notifications.
Also we couldn't implement Observer earlier in FPC
Matt Emson wrote:
I don't think so. I'd hate to see any specific pattern being implemented
at a base level. Why? Exactly what Marco said. Patterns are faddy - you
are not going to please everyone. I'd rather see a mechanism for
injecting first class extensions to existing classes. That way,
Michael Schnell wrote:
Yep. Here you need to do a server and a client and it does not seem to
use procedure message. But In Delphi/Windows you don't need to
create a server. Just using procedure message is enough o receive
a message from another process.
Things are more complicated
Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Sorry, I found it now checks the encoding of the XML file. To accept spanish accented chars, I had to
include ?xml version=1.0 encoding=iso-8859-1? and it worked ok.
The iso-8859-1, utf-8 and utf-16 are the only encodings handled 'natively' (by
the XMLRead unit).
Any
Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
I'm using fcl-xml to parse a XML data from a TMemoryStream/TStringStream and
noted it can parse streams with a maximum capacity of 4096 bytes, why can't it
receive bigger streams?.
The maximum capacity is defined in the constructor of TXMLStreamInputSource, in
Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Thanks Sergey.
I tought that was why my program was stopping with an assertion in procedure
TNodePool.AddExtent of dom.pp, the assertion dissapears when I work with
smaller XML files.
BTW: the file worked with older versions of fcl-xml, now I'm using the trunk
Hello,
What's the reason of having TInterfaceEntryType declared both in RTL (inc/objpash.inc) and compiler
(symconst.pas) and keeping them in sync? It seems that compiler can always use declaration from
System unit, no?
Regards,
Sergei
___
Hello,
I tried to familiarize myself with the issues which must be resolved in order to get the interface
delegation by class-type properties fixed.
It appears that the there are at least two ways to go: do it exactly like in Delphi, or do it
another way :-)
Delphi way is more or less
Paul Ishenin пишет:
What I can't understand why the biggest %time has the lowest seconds. E.g:
The second column is a cumulative time, i.e. sum of the time for the given function and everything
above it.
As result I don't understand which functions must be reviewed at first.
Have
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I have not looked at the cpstrnew branch, but what is the 4 bytes used
for in each string? Couldn't the individual bits in 1 byte value be
used? That will reduce the extra memory overhead by 75%?
It won't. 4 bytes will be used anyway because of alignment.
On x86_64,
Inoussa OUEDRAOGO пишет:
(a long message skipped)
Rather that writing that much, you'd better simply bug me to speed it up :-)
Anyway, done in r14145.
Sergei
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Ivo Steinmann wrote:
but one thing would be nice to have. A compiler switch and/or built in
function to check wheter a symbol is used or not. With this information
is easy to implement smart loading.
The problem is that when compiling a unit, you never know which symbols will be used in the
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Should do the following right? Correct me if i'm wrong:
Static function:
function foobar_dosomething(a:cint; b:cdouble): cint; extdecl;external
foobarlib;
Becomes a dyn function:
var foobar_dosomething: function(a:cint; b:cdouble): cint; extdecl;
And a statement
Paul Ishenin пишет:
2. If I am using PTypeInfo(TypeInfo(Self))^.Kind inside a class method I
get tkUnknown and UnitName is not avaiable ofcource.
Self = TClass, not TObject inside a class method. Obviously, there is no RTTI or
whatever for TClass.
Sergei
Marco van de Voort wrote:
That is not a problem. The problem is that the getvalue/set behaviour must
remain
the same, and I must be able to select the encoding (or it should use the
system default encoding). Those are the things I have many times.
opening/closing only happens a handful times
Marco van de Voort wrote:
short summary:
- need the current interface very badly to be backwards compat, if I (and
Lazarus) are ever migrating to a FCL one. Changes to the interface
not really an option, then I'd stick to my ancient lazarus version forever.
The xmlconf has the same
Hello,
I want to remove the avl_tree-related stuff from DOM unit. The reasons are:
1) It is targeted to optimize one particular type of documents, configs,
that require all node names within a single parent to be unique (strictly
speaking, this isn't xml, it is more like ini-files or
Alexander Klenin пишет:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 23:15, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
This is all just nitpicking. Iterators as a language construct are a very ugly
hack to save some typing, no matter how you turn it. Nice maybe for
languages with dynamic typing and so on,
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hm. I like this direction of thinking, yes...
What about
function StepNext: Boolean; iterator 'movenext';
property TheCurrentValue: Integer; iterator 'current';
or better yet, because it is more strict:
function StepNext: Boolean; iterator nextvalue;
101 - 200 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
