> > I have already opened and issue for Lazarus FPDOC Editor, but now I am not
> > sure if that should be fixed in FPDOC Editor or Makeskel tool so I would
> > appreciate an advice so that I can change bug report if needed.
> >
> > Basically, FPDOC Editor in Lazarus does not recognize record
Sorry, wrong list. Forwarded to fpc-other instead.
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 at 11:43 AM
> From: "Zeljko Avramovic via fpc-devel"
> To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
> Cc: "Zeljko Avramovic"
> Subject: [fpc-devel] Issue in FPDOC Editor or Makeskel?
I have already opened and issue for Lazarus FPDOC Editor, but now I am not sure
if that should be fixed in FPDOC Editor or Makeskel tool so I would appreciate
an advice so that I can change bug report if needed.
Basically, FPDOC Editor in Lazarus does not recognize record helper method
> > https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/39541
>
> Thank you. I already applied 2 patches, I still need to commit the examples.
Nice. Thanks! Please close the issue when you are done.
Btw, I guess that I should create syshelpers.xml for new doc related to just
syshelpers unit?
Done.
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/39541
> > I have just submitted patches for syshelpers here:
> > https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/39268#note_810963784
> >
> > It's a closed thread and I can not reopen it, so maybe it would be better
> > if I
[Probably for @mvancanneyt]
I have just submitted patches for syshelpers here:
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/39268#note_810963784
It's a closed thread and I can not reopen it, so maybe it would be better if I
open a new issue? If yes then please say so.
uot;Zeljko Avramovic via fpc-devel"
> Cc: "Zeljko Avramovic"
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] BitHelpers
>
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021, Zeljko Avramovic via fpc-devel wrote:
>
> > BitHelpers are quite mature now and I would like to see them as part of
> &
As discussed at
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55397.0.html, this
compiles and works well:
{$MACRO ON}
{$if SizeOf(byte) = 1}
WriteLn('SizeOf(byte) = ', SizeOf(byte));
{$endif}
however this does not compile:
{$MACRO ON}
{$define TMyOrdinalType := byte}
BitHelpers are quite mature now and I would like to see them as part of
FreePascal. If devs agree to that, then I would like to discuss what is the
best way to include them. As mentioned at
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,41672.msg409880.html#msg409880,
Thaddy would like
In example bellow, both record field ID.PGN and type helper for that record
field ID.PGN.PS point to the same memory location in a bitpacked record not
aligned to a byte. ID.PGN can be modified correctly. ID.PGN.PS can not be
modified correctly. If a field in a bitpacked record can work well
> I had a look.
Thanks, I really appreciate it.
> Since this is currently linux-only, and there are several units, I would opt
> to make this a separate
> package.
>
> The directory structure to use should be clear, I suppose:
>
> can
> can/src
> can/examples
Understood.
> Is there any
Hello everyone,
I have implemented SocketCAN wrappers for FreePascal which I would like to contribute. Before creating a patch for Mantis, could someone please take a look at it's current form and advise me on further steps, changes and improvements that I should eventually do? I would like it
12 matches
Mail list logo
