imal" libraries are
mainly aimed at financial computations.
mm
___
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
ot;?
As a FPC user, I prefer they spend their time in developping FPC, not in
searching bugs that, maybe, exist nowhere but in a user program. Of
course, it is up to us, FPC users, to provide the code that activates
a bug.
mm
http://www.ellipsa.net/
___
companies make use of Delphi instead of Lazarus/FPC). Here, the
threat is much more efficient than the attack.
mm
http://www.ellipsa.net
___
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Jonas Maebe a écrit :
On 18 Oct 2007, at 16:17, mm wrote:
The inlined code shouldn't be much bigger than the calls to "Odd()". So,
why aren't they inlined? Is there a reason you did so?
It's because the Odd function is an assembler function, and the compiler
c
e "Odd()", its code is
stuffed with expressions like "if (N and 1) <> 0 then" (it works but
this is less legible than "if Odd(N) then").
The inlined code shouldn't be much bigger than the calls to "Odd()". So,
