On 06/10/2010 10:30 PM, Den Jean wrote:
thanks to the fpc arm fix of Jonas, fpc is now working on the Nokia N900
(arm).
http://users.telenet.be/Jan.Van.hijfte/qtforfpc/maemo_lcl_qt4.png
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/qt/2010-June/001547.html
Congrats !
Do I understand
En/na Michael Schnell ha escrit:
Is the N900 modified in any way to allow for loading and running native
Linux applications ? Do Linux command line tools easily run on the N900 ?
I don't have an n900, but previous maemo devices don't need any
modification to run native Linux applications
On 06/11/2010 10:28 AM, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Note that maemo is almost dead, due to the switch to meego (not that
it will change that much, since Qt will be natively supported instead
of being an add-on).
Sounds great !
Looking forward to the meego Widget Set selection in Lazarus :)
-Michael
On Friday 11 June 2010 10:28:59 Luca Olivetti wrote:
Note that maemo is almost dead, due to the switch to meego (not that it
Do not exaggerate. N900 PR1.2 (Maemo 5 Qt 4.6.2) is only some weeks old,
MeeGo for arm is not even released yet, as its first target device
is not released either. The
On Sunday 23 May 2010 21:51:17 Den Jean wrote:
I made a demo program of the bug,
using the style of one of the fpc test suite program tcalext2.pp
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16520
thanks to the fpc arm fix of Jonas, fpc is now working on the Nokia N900 (arm).
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 10:18:53 Michael Schnell wrote:
If the compiler does digest this, the meaning supposedly is that the
procedure gets an additional, supposedly first, parameter (hidden in
Object Pascal, open in C, that is the self pointer of the instance. If
the C programmer knows how
On 05/18/2010 06:51 PM, Den Jean wrote:
Note how I say c-functions and not c++ functions.
OK, But your code is
procedure of object;CDecl;
i.e. using a C ABI for a class function.
If the compiler does digest this, the meaning supposedly is that the
procedure gets an additional, supposedly
On Monday 17 May 2010 22:22:13 Den Jean wrote:
Hi,
I am investigating why Qt on armel has problems.
I think that one of the problems is
that when c-functions are called from
pascal that the parameters are not passed
correctly (or not as I expected and accommodated for).
On Tuesday 18
