2018-06-30 11:03 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth via fpc-devel <
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>:
> mORMot is a third party project that can be used with FPC while Delphi is
> essentially a template and base line for compatibility, so there is a
> difference between the two. Though if you have a formal name
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018, Maciej Izak wrote:
2018-06-30 8:55 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth via fpc-devel <
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>:
No, the bad taste is too have a class that appears to be named
specifically to fit a specific third party project inside a general purpose
library.
Ok, I agree
Am 30.06.2018 um 09:52 schrieb Maciej Izak:
2018-06-30 8:55 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth via fpc-devel
mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>>:
No, the bad taste is too have a class that appears to be named
specifically to fit a specific third party project inside a
general purpose
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018, Maciej Izak wrote:
But not problem, please advise on the changes needed to a) fix the
mentioned example so it actually compiles.
b) Speed up the default hash.
I (or someone else) will be happy to change it.
Ok, but in the future you should ask for such important
2018-06-30 8:55 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth via fpc-devel <
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>:
> No, the bad taste is too have a class that appears to be named
> specifically to fit a specific third party project inside a general purpose
> library.
>
Ok, I agree here, but why Michael Van Canneyt decide
2018-06-30 8:33 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
> As noted in the bugreport, your own examples did not compile with your
> supplied code.
> Next time, please test that too.
>
The most important was to finish new collections, deep refactoring and
proper tests suite than testing all examples.
Maciej Izak schrieb am Sa., 30. Juni 2018, 08:16:
> Hi,
>
> renaming for TMormotHashFactory to TGenericsHashFactory is somehow
> acceptable (but IMO bad taste) but change for default hashing algorithm in
> such important library is really really really bad idea.
>
No, the bad taste is too have
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018, Maciej Izak wrote:
Hi,
renaming for TMormotHashFactory to TGenericsHashFactory is somehow
acceptable (but IMO bad taste) but change for default hashing algorithm in
such important library is really really really bad idea.
As noted in the bugreport, your own examples
Hi,
renaming for TMormotHashFactory to TGenericsHashFactory is somehow
acceptable (but IMO bad taste) but change for default hashing algorithm in
such important library is really really really bad idea.
This was not consulted, change like that or proposition should be reported
here :
