Given it's licensed under the GNU GPL, I
wonder if there's some optimisation
paradigms that we can use from there as
well, such as loop unrolling and the like.
Kit
On Wed 06/12/17 08:08 , Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk sent:
> On 05/12/17 22:15, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
> >
On 05/12/17 22:15, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Tue, December 5, 2017 21:50, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:> Should I still open a
bug/feature request though? When it comes to> high-performance applications such as>
games and scientific/mathematical programs, I feel this is quite> important.
I believe that
On Tue, December 5, 2017 21:50, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
> Should I still open a bug/feature request though? When it comes to
> high-performance applications such as
> games and scientific/mathematical programs, I feel this is quite
> important.
I believe that the feature request entry in Mantis
(Just bringing it up here because I've noticed that the feature ideas page
doesn't tend to get many
updates.)
Okay, I've put forth two feature requests over here:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Feature_Ideas#FPC (I
made a new "FPC" section because these are language features rather than
Should I still open a bug/feature request though? When it comes to
high-performance applications such as
games and scientific/mathematical programs, I feel this is quite important.
Kit
On Tue 05/12/17 17:34 , "J. Gareth Moreton" gar...@moreton-family.com sent:
> Thanks for the answers
Thanks for the answers everyone. I've
added my suggestion near the bottom of the
page. I wasn't sure because what I propose
is a language feature, namely per-type
byte alignment.
Kit
On Tue 05/12/17 13:05 , Bart
bartjun...@gmail.com sent:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Mark
Morgan
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> But please make sure that any wiki page is marked as being for the
> discussion of a suggestion, and that it's deleted if not adopted. The wiki's
> already got a maintenance problem with outmoded
On 04/12/17 21:15, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
Hi everyone,>> I have a little question to ask. If one wishes to
request new features for a future version of Free Pascal, > how does
one go about it and what is the process of determining if it is a
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:58 PM, J. Gareth Moreton
wrote:
> I have a little question to ask. If one wishes to request new features for a
> future version of Free Pascal,
> how does one go about it and what is the process of determining if it is a
> good idea or
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a little question to ask. If one wishes to request new features for a future version of Free Pascal,
how does one go about it and what is the process of determining if it is a good idea or should be dropped, as
well as any
Hi everyone,
I have a little question to ask. If one wishes to request new features for a
future version of Free Pascal,
how does one go about it and what is the process of determining if it is a good
idea or should be dropped, as
well as any cross-platform and language nuances that need
11 matches
Mail list logo