Neil Graham a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 18:10 +0700, Bee wrote:
Maybe we should start some kind of code legality check. Like what had
been done by ReactOS a few months ago against Windows' code. This tool
might helps us review FPC's and Lazarus' code against Delphi code (or
other as
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:05 +0100, mm wrote:
Neil Graham a écrit :
It may mean an easy and acceptable solution. They may just say no.
Then again it may be like drawing the gaze of the eye of mordor.
I don't think it is a good idea. In case of a court sue, it could be
used by Borland
The software used between the Linux and Minix case was SIM. It seems
to be quite cleaver software and hope we can use it too..
quote
The software similarity tester SIM version 2.12
[ftp://ftp.cs.vu.nl/pub/dick/similarity_tester] was used for source
code comparison.
/quote
I got that information
The software used between the Linux and Minix case was SIM. It seems
to be quite cleaver software and hope we can use it too..
Maybe we should start some kind of code legality check. Like what had
been done by ReactOS a few months ago against Windows' code. This tool
might helps us review
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 18:10 +0700, Bee wrote:
Maybe we should start some kind of code legality check. Like what had
been done by ReactOS a few months ago against Windows' code. This tool
might helps us review FPC's and Lazarus' code against Delphi code (or
other as well?).
Wouldn't it be
It may mean an easy and acceptable solution. They may just say no.
It's the very possibility since they think we're the 'bad' guys. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-devel maillist -
