On 12/4/05, L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, then, I should more so compare FPC to something like python or perl
rather
than GCC. Because GCC was available years ago when FPC was not. Whereas perl
an
python are newer. I think *part* of the reason perl is popular is because of
all
On 5 dec 2005, at 11:56, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
There are way more Pascal projects then Python or Perl projects. The
only thing being that the majority of this projects are created with
Delphi and not Free Pascal. Things like Skype and Age of Wonders
computer game were created with
On 12/5/05, Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least the Mac OS X version of Skype seems to be a combination of C+
+ and Objective-C, with no FPC-generated code in sight.
It probably is. But the initial version, the Windows one is a Delphi
app. The Linux and Mac OS versions are not ports
I think like how torry.net, Delphi 3000, etc. work (but you obviously can
create
smaller websites than that) people should be building independent websites to
promote
freepascal.
I would diagree. Up to now there a tons of sites concering FPC/Lazarus:
freepascal.org, sourceforge,
On 24 Nov 2005, at 18:28, L505 wrote:
I don't think the GNU C compiler is popular because of one nice
website. I think the
reason GNU C compiler is successful is because of all the fan boys
I'm quite sure it's mainly successful because it's the default (and
often only) C compiler on
Op Thu, 24 Nov 2005, schreef L505:
I'm talking about genuine, unique, freepascal user websites. Look how many
PHP or
Visual Basic sites there are, with I'm a happy PHP user written all over
them. The
extension myfile.php is marketing itself. If your websites had a myfile.pp or
mysite.fp
On 11/24/05, Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think other people are encouraged to build FPC related websites
if they
can't help the freepascal site directly.
Giving ideas doesn't help. We need people to do the work. We can't
extended/debug fpc itself and rewrite a website at the
On 03 Dec 2005, at 11:55, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Ok, even if outside websites about free pascal help more then working
on free pascal website directly, why don't you make it possible for
people to see the website code and submit patches for it?
The code is in svn, in
Op Sat, 3 Dec 2005, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On 11/24/05, Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think other people are encouraged to build FPC related websites
if they
can't help the freepascal site directly.
Giving ideas doesn't help. We need people to do the work.
I don't think the GNU C compiler is popular because of one nice
website. I think the
reason GNU C compiler is successful is because of all the fan boys
I'm quite sure it's mainly successful because it's the default (and
often only) C compiler on Linux systems, as well as ported to pretty
I read the very interesting article about the Systems fair:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Systems_2005
One conclusion was that the web appearance needs to be improved:
..
The websites are a serious problem. They are quite ugly and not very
intuitive, and this is the case for
L505 wrote:
I think like how torry.net, Delphi 3000, etc. work (but you obviously can create
smaller websites than that) people should be building independent websites to
promote
freepascal.
I would diagree. Up to now there a tons of sites concering FPC/Lazarus:
freepascal.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
some discussion points:
- one canonical site
- consistent style/color on all sites
- strip off old bones (TP tutorials, MOS)
- merge FPC and Lazarus sites
this is about the same we've discussed during Systems... :)
13 matches
Mail list logo
