- Original Message -
From: Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] don't you think it'stime
toupdatedelphimodecompatibility? - IDispatch, implements
Besides I find
- Original Message -
From: Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] don't you think it'stime
toupdatedelphimodecompatibility? - IDispatch, implements
Besides I find
On 29 May 2004, at 12:21, Matthias Hryniszak wrote:
In addition comparing the sources of VCL and FCL they don't differ
that much and the source isn't that much bigger so by this kind of
differences the problem must lie with compiler/linker.
Have you tried using smart linking? (-XX)
At 12:55 29-5-2005, you wrote:
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sat, 29 May 2004, schreef Matthias Hryniszak:
In addition comparing the sources of VCL and FCL they
don't differ that much and the source isn't that much bigger so by this kind
of differences the problem must lie with compiler/linker.
Some things that will affect executable size include:
1) Over zealous use of inlining (I dont see a command option to
control how much inlining is done)
There is almost none in the rtl.
Doesn't the compiler attempt to inline small functions/methods
automatically as part of its
On 29 May 2005, at 13:26, Jamie McCracken wrote:
There is almost none in the rtl.
Doesn't the compiler attempt to inline small functions/methods
automatically as part of its optimisation (even if the inline
directive is not specified)?
No.
Jonas
There is almost none in the rtl.
Doesn't the compiler attempt to inline small functions/methods
automatically as part of its optimisation (even if the inline
directive is not specified)?
No.
The inline directive is only a hint to the compiler. The behaviour is the
same in D2005.
Peter
On 29 May 2005, at 14:03, Jamie McCracken wrote:
well thats soemthing you should add to your to do list.
There are plenty of things on our todo list already to keep us
busy :) We've already talked about automatic inlining in the past,
but nobody has spent time on it yet afaik.
Jonas
well thats soemthing you should add to your to do list. Automatic
inlining can deliver a signifcant performance improvement especially
as delphi uses a lot of one line procedures to set property values. A
fucntion call adds quite a bit of overhead (around 10+ clock cycles at
a guess)
But
Jamie McCracken wrote:
well thats soemthing you should add to your to do list. Automatic
inlining can deliver a signifcant performance improvement especially
as delphi uses a lot of one line procedures to set property values. A
fucntion call adds quite a bit of overhead (around 10+ clock
10 matches
Mail list logo
