On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:44 AM NetSpirit via fpc-devel
wrote:
> I don't have an account in bug tracker. I post here to get confirmation
> and opinion from other members.
> In hope that one, who can create bug reports, will do this.
Just make one, not so hard.
Unfiled bugreports wiil get
NetSpirit via fpc-devel schrieb am Di.,
19. Mai 2020, 11:44:
> > Please report as a bug.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sven
> >
>
> I don't have an account in bug tracker. I post here to get confirmation
> and opinion from other members.
> In hope that one, who can create bug reports, will do this.
>
NetSpirit via fpc-devel schrieb am Di.,
19. Mai 2020, 10:05:
> > if anyone wants to assign me one of the new bugs to fix that have been
> > raised since the RC was released, I'll be happy to take a look. >
> > Gareth aka. Kit
>
>
> Not special for this RC but some bugs:
>
> ===
> 1)
I'm having problems connecting to the FTP server to download the release
candidate - it keeps timing out.
Gareth aka. Kit
On 29/03/2020 19:18, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Hello,
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.2.0 on our ftp servers.
You can
I regret to say that I can't reproduce my initial result showing 9%
improvement on 3.2.0rc1 against 3.0.4. Both versions show the same speed
now.
I also compared 3.0.4 against trunk in another environment:
Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS (GNU/Linux 4.15.0-1014-gcp x86_64)
cpu model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
With your permission I'd like to use this project as part of my work to
improve the peephole optimiser, among other things. Any improvements
probably won't happen until the version after 3.2.0, but I like a challenge!
J. Gareth Moreton, aka. Kit
P.S. One of the things I introduced into FPC
Hm, for me the new compiler produces slightly slower results. The
difference is tiny, but consistent. I use my raytracing benchmark from here:
http://runtimeterror.com/tools/raybench/
The results on my AMD Ryzen 3700X are:
FPC 3.0.4: 3.984 seconds
FPC 3.2.0RC1: 4.047 seconds
As i wrote, the
Am 31.03.20 um 05:55 schrieb Joao Schuler:
Just tested with my own neural networks API and I can confirm that it works!
Environment: WIN10 64bits AVX
Tested with:
https://github.com/joaopauloschuler/neural-api/blob/master/examples/SimpleImageClassifier/SimpleImageClassifier.lpr
In this
That's pretty good! I guess our individual work on the compiler. while
maybe giving marginal gains, really accumulate.
Gareth aka. Kit
On 31/03/2020 04:55, Joao Schuler wrote:
Just tested with my own neural networks API and I can confirm that it
works!
Environment: WIN10 64bits AVX
Tested
Just tested with my own neural networks API and I can confirm that it works!
Environment: WIN10 64bits AVX
Tested with:
https://github.com/joaopauloschuler/neural-api/blob/master/examples/SimpleImageClassifier/SimpleImageClassifier.lpr
In this test, there is a performance gain (speed) against
Le 30/03/2020 à 15:33, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-devel a écrit :
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 20:18:19 +0200
> Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> You can help improve the upcoming 3.2.0 release by downloading and
>> testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done
>> here:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-devel wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 20:18:19 +0200
Marco van de Voort wrote:
[...]
You can help improve the upcoming 3.2.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done
here:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 20:18:19 +0200
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>[...]
> You can help improve the upcoming 3.2.0 release by downloading and
> testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done
> here: http://wiki.freepascal.org/Testers_3.2.0 or in the maillist.
It seems
13 matches
Mail list logo
