On Sun, 22 May 2005, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
Hi
Compilation of fpimgcmn.pp is broken starting from revision 33 (some part of
code that was $ifdefed earlier by VER1_0 stayed), I'm attaching a trivial
patch.
You must have missed my fix then, because it is already fixed since revision
You can also download fpc.zip from ftp.freepascal.org\fpc\snapshot\v20 or
v21\source- that way you get everything (from the prev. night) in one
go...John
Well, now it is worked. But where is any 'whatsnew' files or another log of
changes?
___
What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port?
Will it supported in 2.0.x branch?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Date sent: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:03:37 +0200
To: Ivan Shikhalev [EMAIL PROTECTED],
FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
From: Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms
Copies to:
Date sent: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:03:37 +0200
To: Ivan Shikhalev [EMAIL PROTECTED],
FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
From: Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms
At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote:
What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port?
Hi,
In order to create the rtl docs for sourceforge (
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/ ) I needed to pass the
--footer=xxx to fpdoc. Because I wanted to use make, for creating these
docs, I modified the Makefile (see attached diff). I also needed a
content file as input for
Hi everybody!
Why in fact were MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize removed from the RTL? The
explanation in install/doc/whatsnew.txt is puzzling me a bit:
- Removed MaxAvail, MemAvail, HeapSize due to their unreliability
(bogus/misleading return values) in multitasking environment with
swapping
Is
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Konstantin Münning wrote:
Hi everybody!
Why in fact were MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize removed from the RTL? The
explanation in install/doc/whatsnew.txt is puzzling me a bit:
- Removed MaxAvail, MemAvail, HeapSize due to their unreliability
(bogus/misleading
Konstantin Münning wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Konstantin Münning wrote:
Hi everybody!
Why in fact were MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize removed from the RTL? The
explanation in install/doc/whatsnew.txt is puzzling me a bit:
- Removed MaxAvail, MemAvail, HeapSize due to their unreliability
On 22 May 2005, at 20:07, Konstantin Münning wrote:
When you skip the check and allocate always then the program will
crash anyway when there is not enough memory.
No. Either you catch exceptions resulting from a lack of memory and
recover, and then you have the same checking as before,
Bram Kuijvenhoven wrote:
The storage specifiers are not explained in the FPC reference manual as
far as I know, though they are in the syntaxis diagram of course.
Michael?
And somehow FPC allows default values for singles.
... because they have a size of 4 which is required for a default
On 23 May 2005, at 00:56, Konstantin Münning wrote:
No. Either you catch exceptions resulting from a lack of memory and
recover, and then you have the same checking as before, except
that the
check happens atomically (by the OS: you ask for more memory and if
there is no more memory, you
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 23 May 2005, at 00:56, Konstantin Münning wrote:
No. Either you catch exceptions resulting from a lack of memory and
recover, and then you have the same checking as before, except that
the
check happens atomically (by the OS: you ask for more memory and if
there
13 matches
Mail list logo
