Hi,
I would welcome inlining of (simple) asm routines. Lately I wanted to
use the BEXTR instruction to speed up some inlined bit reading
functions. As there's no intrinsic for it and including even a simple
assembly method disables inlining, it didn't go well.
As for using a BEXTR intrinsic
Hi all,
as we have discovered in 0033576 and 0033614, there is a bug somewhere in the
loop unroll optimization pass that only appears in complex enough code. The
problem is, it doesn't happen in the single testsuite test, and the observable
crashes in Lazarus are caused by memory corruption at
Am 16.05.2018 um 14:57 schrieb Martok:
> Hi all,
>
> as we have discovered in 0033576 and 0033614, there is a bug somewhere in the
> loop unroll optimization pass that only appears in complex enough code. The
> problem is, it doesn't happen in the single testsuite test, and the observable
>
Unless I'm mistaken, Wolf, you cannot inline procedures that have asm
blocks appearing anywhere (this includes the entire procedure).
Nevertheless, does the disassembly of your program show it to be inlined?
Gareth aka. Kit
___
fpc-devel maillist -
On 14/05/2018 04:30, David Pethes wrote:
Hi,
I would welcome inlining of (simple) asm routines.
I do not know what you consider to be the existing obstacles to inlining
assembler routines. What I do know is that in the attached program,
inlining does work. It summarises my (current)
