Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:31:25 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Why is the local variable block needed?
It is not. I asked the same question. It was added for symmetry
reasons: if a local type block is allowed, then a var block should
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:31:25 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Why is the local variable block needed?
It is not. I asked the same question. It was added for symmetry
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:31:25 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Why is the local variable block needed?
It is not. I asked the same question. It was added for
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:31:25 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Why is the local
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:20:13 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
What local types are/will be allowed?
For example, this is currently not allowed:
generic TTreeT = class(TObject)
type public TTreeNode = specialize TNodeT;
end;
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
For example, this is currently not allowed:
generic TTreeT = class(TObject)
type public
TTreeNode = specialize TNodeT;
end;
Shouldn't this be allowed?
Perhaps it can only work with a complete TTreeNode description, probably
the TNode is specific for use
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
For example, this is currently not allowed:
generic TTreeT = class(TObject)
type public TTreeNode = specialize TNodeT;
end;
And this neither:
generic TTreeT = class(TObject)
type public
TTreeNode = class
Data: T;
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Tom Verhoeff wrote:
Is it possible to merge Jochem's extensions with the main trunk?
They are in the SVN repository in branches/tue/.
As far as I am concerned, this is a welcome addition.
If possible, I would even include your user.pdf in the docs.
If it is written in
