Re: [fpc-devel] Closures / anonymous methods

2016-11-25 Thread Sven Barth
Am 25.11.2016 15:30 schrieb : > > On 24.11.2016 21:38, Sven Barth wrote: >> >> On 31.10.2016 14:58, bla...@blaise.ru wrote: >>> >>> I would like a commitment from at least one of the committers to work closely with me during that period on resolving issues that prevent merging.

Re: [fpc-devel] Closures / anonymous methods

2016-11-25 Thread Zoƫ Peterson
> So what next? Blaise is still interested in? Am I alone on battle > field? Is Scooter Software around? I am confused. Yes, we're still around. Yes, we're still willing to throw some money at anyone else who can help get this pushed in, whether that's Blaise, Sven, or Maciej. I don't have

Re: [fpc-devel] Closures / anonymous methods

2016-11-25 Thread Blaise
On 24.11.2016 21:38, Sven Barth wrote: On 31.10.2016 14:58, bla...@blaise.ru wrote: I would like a commitment from at least one of the committers to work closely with me during that period on resolving issues that prevent merging. And by that I mean to be ready to react to my

Re: [fpc-devel] Closures / anonymous methods

2016-11-25 Thread Sven Barth
Am 25.11.2016 09:45 schrieb "Maciej Izak" : > > > 2016-11-24 19:38 GMT+01:00 Sven Barth : >> >> mea culpa > > > So what next? Blaise is still interested in? Am I alone on battle field? Is Scooter Software around? I am confused. Give them some time

[fpc-devel] Crosscompiling win towards darwin

2016-11-25 Thread Alfred
Well, we're talking about two different things. In this interpretation, NewPascal serves as some kind of FPC-experimental branch. Which is nice, and nothing to have against it. But still, before merging anything to a master branch, there should be a way to review patches for obvious

Re: [fpc-devel] Crosscompiling win towards darwin

2016-11-25 Thread Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR)
Hi, On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Alfred wrote: > > TL;DR: if this patch was accepted into NewPascal w/o comments or concerns, > > then "ouch"... > > Thanks for your advice. > This is exactly why NewPascal is here ! > > Have an idea. Implement. Make public. > perfect:=false; > while (NOT perfect) Use;

Re: [fpc-devel] Closures / anonymous methods

2016-11-25 Thread Maciej Izak
2016-11-24 19:38 GMT+01:00 Sven Barth : > mea culpa So what next? Blaise is still interested in? Am I alone on battle field? Is Scooter Software around? I am confused. -- Best regards, Maciej Izak ___ fpc-devel maillist