I'm attaching a simple demo program that shows this. When compiled like
fpc -OG -O2 -Op2 demo_resourcestring_slow.pas
(to get maximum optimizations) sample output of it is
Time of Foo_Normal: 16
Time of Foo_ResourceString: 106
So time difference is really noticeable.
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
Hi,
I tested your code and found that indeed version in ucopylist is
slightly faster (by about 9.5 / 7 =~ 1.357). Two things:
1. Speedup is only 1.357x, not 3x, like you said. Are you sure that
you're getting 3x speedup ? On what OS and
This is because there is an extra (implicit) Try/Finally block.
Thank you and Peter for answers. This way I was able to see how
try...finally section looks in assembler :) Anyway, I understand that
the answer is can't be speed up. OK, I can live with that.
That is not correct. For your own
Peter Vreman wrote:
This is because there is an extra (implicit) Try/Finally block.
Thank you and Peter for answers. This way I was able to see how
try...finally section looks in assembler :) Anyway, I understand that
the answer is can't be speed up. OK, I can live with that.
That is not correct.
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
Peter Vreman wrote:
This is because there is an extra (implicit) Try/Finally block.
Thank you and Peter for answers. This way I was able to see how
try...finally section looks in assembler :) Anyway, I understand that
the answer is can't be
Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
Hi,
I tested your code and found that indeed version in ucopylist is
slightly faster (by about 9.5 / 7 =~ 1.357). Two things:
1. Speedup is only 1.357x, not 3x, like you said. Are you sure that
you're getting 3x speedup ? On what OS and with what FPC version are
you
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:56:24 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the answer is yes, then maybe it's safe to compile parts of FPC
sources in lists.inc (like TList.Get) inside {$IMPLICITEXCEPTIONS OFF} ?
Why not put it into a sub proc:
function
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:56:24 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the answer is yes, then maybe it's safe to compile parts of FPC
sources in lists.inc (like TList.Get) inside {$IMPLICITEXCEPTIONS
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:56:24 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the answer is yes, then maybe it's safe to compile parts of FPC
sources in lists.inc (like TList.Get) inside
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:49:10 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:56:24 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the answer is yes,
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:49:10 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:56:24 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt
11 matches
Mail list logo
