On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:17:46 +0200
Bart wrote:
>[...]
> Not being able to have proper debugging info might reflect poorly on
> both FreePascal and Lazarus and scare away new users, especially if it
> would take a long time to release a fix.
+1
> The only alternative
> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:17:46 +0200
> From: Bart
> To: fpc-devel
> Subject: [fpc-devel] Request for an interim release of the 3.0 branch
> Message-ID:
>
>
In our previous episode, Bart said:
> The issue is fixed by merging r33007, 33008, 33561 and 34384 (unit exeinfo).
> Probably r35886 should be merged as well.
These revs ( but not 35886) are merged in the fixes branch a few days back
when I saw the bugreport about the issue, please test.
On 4/26/17, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> These revs ( but not 35886) are merged in the fixes branch a few days back
> when I saw the bugreport about the issue, please test.
I have tested exeinfo of r33007,33008,33561,34384 (I left all other
sourcecode of 3.0.2 as is) and all
Am 26.04.2017 um 12:57 schrieb Schindler Karl-Michael:
>> The only alternative would be to advise *nix users to use the 3.0.0
>> release instead.
>>
>> Bart
>
> my two cents:
>
> 1) Why not call it 3.0.4?
I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then.
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, LacaK wrote:
The only alternative would be to advise *nix users to use the 3.0.0
release instead.
3.0.0 has (IMO serious) bug involving calculations with currency
datatype on some platforms (Win64, Arm):
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28748
Bart
my two
The only alternative would be to advise *nix users to use the 3.0.0
release instead.
3.0.0 has (IMO serious) bug involving calculations with currency
datatype on some platforms (Win64, Arm):
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28748
Bart
my two cents:
1) Why not call it 3.0.4?
I