J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel schrieb am
Sa., 27. Apr. 2024, 10:00:
> You've piqued my interest. I currently only have the ability to develop
> on aarch64-linux (Raspberry Pi 400), but I'm curious to know if I can get a
> version of Windows to run on it, even if the performance will be very
On 27/04/2024 13:45, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Ok, I would like to start another attempt to support properties when
using fpdebug as debugger.
I would recommend asking guidance on the DWARF list (dwarf-discuss).
Maybe there are already standard-supported constructs to do this.
Jonas
Ok, I would like to start another attempt to support properties when
using fpdebug as debugger.
The idea is to add custom tags in the dwarf info. This can be done by a
new option -godwarfporperties
Though, it may be better to go with -godwarffpdbg / similar to -godwarfcpp
Making it fpdebug
I figured that would be the case with the PE format. Fun times ahead!
Kit
On 27/04/2024 13:06, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel
schrieb am Sa., 27. Apr. 2024, 10:00:
You've piqued my interest. I currently only have the ability to
develop on
On 27/04/2024 15:24, Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel wrote:
On 27/04/2024 13:45, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Ok, I would like to start another attempt to support properties when
using fpdebug as debugger.
I would recommend asking guidance on the DWARF list (dwarf-discuss).
Maybe there are
On 27/04/2024 17:05, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
On 27/04/2024 15:24, Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel wrote:
On 27/04/2024 13:45, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Ok, I would like to start another attempt to support properties when
using fpdebug as debugger.
I would recommend asking guidance on
On 27/04/2024 17:18, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
One of the posts also brings up the idea of avoiding labels (in asm),
and keep track of locations by counting the bytes in the generated dwarf
as part of the compilers work (IMHO duplicate what the asm already can do?)
That's not the
On 27/04/2024 20:29, Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel wrote:
On 27/04/2024 17:18, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
One of the posts also brings up the idea of avoiding labels (in asm),
and keep track of locations by counting the bytes in the generated
dwarf as part of the compilers work (IMHO
On 27/04/2024 21:40, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Maybe a miss understanding: storing the difference between 2 local
labels would be the asm?
But if (e.g. on Linux) it is cross units then its the linker.
There are 2 consideration here.
1)
First, telling the asm to store ".l99 -
