Re: [fpc-devel] fpc-devel Digest, Vol 156, Issue 16

2017-04-28 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Schindler Karl-Michael said: > my two cents: > > 1) Why not call it 3.0.4? > 2) arm-nds and arm gba do not build with 3.0.2: Apply the patches from issue > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30405 and > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=26847 I merged the

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc-devel Digest, Vol 156, Issue 16

2017-04-28 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: > > I think it is best to take a few weeks to merge whatever else can be useful > > for 3.0.4 (and I'm open to suggestions) and then just release a normal 3.0.4 > > I think probably a lot of package fixes can be merged. > Especially fcl-passrc

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc-devel Digest, Vol 156, Issue 16

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: >>> 1) Why not call it 3.0.4? >> I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then. > +1 Just a linux i386 version (where the problem is acute) or all platforms ? I assume it

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc-devel Digest, Vol 156, Issue 16

2017-04-27 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: > >>> 1) Why not call it 3.0.4? > >> I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then. > > +1 > > Just a linux i386 version (where the problem is acute) or all platforms ? I assume it touches all ELF targets, so FreeBSD should go too.

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc-devel Digest, Vol 156, Issue 16

2017-04-27 Thread wkitty42
On 04/27/2017 01:26 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: 1) Why not call it 3.0.4? I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then. +1 Just a linux i386 version (where the problem is acute) or all platforms ? personally speaking, i would do them all to maintain version consistency

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc-devel Digest, Vol 156, Issue 16

2017-04-26 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, LacaK wrote: The only alternative would be to advise *nix users to use the 3.0.0 release instead. 3.0.0 has (IMO serious) bug involving calculations with currency datatype on some platforms (Win64, Arm): http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28748 Bart my two

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc-devel Digest, Vol 156, Issue 16

2017-04-26 Thread LacaK
The only alternative would be to advise *nix users to use the 3.0.0 release instead. 3.0.0 has (IMO serious) bug involving calculations with currency datatype on some platforms (Win64, Arm): http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28748 Bart my two cents: 1) Why not call it 3.0.4? I

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc-devel Digest, Vol 156, Issue 16

2017-04-26 Thread Florian Klämpfl
Am 26.04.2017 um 12:57 schrieb Schindler Karl-Michael: >> The only alternative would be to advise *nix users to use the 3.0.0 >> release instead. >> >> Bart > > my two cents: > > 1) Why not call it 3.0.4? I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then.

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc-devel Digest, Vol 156, Issue 16

2017-04-26 Thread Schindler Karl-Michael
> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:17:46 +0200 > From: Bart > To: fpc-devel > Subject: [fpc-devel] Request for an interim release of the 3.0 branch > Message-ID: > >