In our previous episode, Schindler Karl-Michael said:
> my two cents:
>
> 1) Why not call it 3.0.4?
> 2) arm-nds and arm gba do not build with 3.0.2: Apply the patches from issue
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30405 and
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=26847
I merged the
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> > I think it is best to take a few weeks to merge whatever else can be useful
> > for 3.0.4 (and I'm open to suggestions) and then just release a normal 3.0.4
>
> I think probably a lot of package fixes can be merged.
> Especially fcl-passrc
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
>>> 1) Why not call it 3.0.4?
>> I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then.
> +1
Just a linux i386 version (where the problem is acute) or all platforms ?
I assume it
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> >>> 1) Why not call it 3.0.4?
> >> I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then.
> > +1
>
> Just a linux i386 version (where the problem is acute) or all platforms ?
I assume it touches all ELF targets, so FreeBSD should go too.
On 04/27/2017 01:26 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
1) Why not call it 3.0.4?
I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then.
+1
Just a linux i386 version (where the problem is acute) or all platforms ?
personally speaking, i would do them all to maintain version consistency
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, LacaK wrote:
The only alternative would be to advise *nix users to use the 3.0.0
release instead.
3.0.0 has (IMO serious) bug involving calculations with currency
datatype on some platforms (Win64, Arm):
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28748
Bart
my two
The only alternative would be to advise *nix users to use the 3.0.0
release instead.
3.0.0 has (IMO serious) bug involving calculations with currency
datatype on some platforms (Win64, Arm):
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28748
Bart
my two cents:
1) Why not call it 3.0.4?
I
Am 26.04.2017 um 12:57 schrieb Schindler Karl-Michael:
>> The only alternative would be to advise *nix users to use the 3.0.0
>> release instead.
>>
>> Bart
>
> my two cents:
>
> 1) Why not call it 3.0.4?
I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then.
> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:17:46 +0200
> From: Bart
> To: fpc-devel
> Subject: [fpc-devel] Request for an interim release of the 3.0 branch
> Message-ID:
>
>