Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 06 Oct 2012, at 23:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: To be fair, it's probably useful to mention that the example forum prepared by Peter should be better compared to the forum we currently provide on FPC pages (community.freepascal.org) rather than NNTP newsgroups, etc., which we do not provide

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said: He unsubscribed from all FPC lists immediately after he sent his last message. Highly regrettable, but at least it happened /before/ all of the mailing lists etc. were transitioned to a system which the core project maintainers didn't

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said: Highly regrettable, but at least it happened /before/ all of the mailing lists etc. were transitioned to a system which the core project maintainers didn't understand and might not be in control of. I don't think he ever insisted on that, and

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 07 Oct 2012, at 12:17, Marco van de Voort wrote: Why run a separate forum from Lazarus? The current fora are already separate, so switching to better forum software would have been an improvement as far as I'm concerned. Merging the FPC and Lazarus fora has been discussed/proposed for