[fpc-pascal]Something of a mystery....

2003-08-28 Thread L D Blake
Ok guys I've got something of a mystery going on at this end and I sure could use some suggestions... My system: Amd 1800xp, 256mb ram, gigabyte motherboard, TNT 64 video, no overclocks or other enhancements... Wind2000 sp4 with free pascal on it's own partition. I'm working on a piece of

Re: [fpc-pascal]TStringList.indexOf (case-sensitivity)

2003-08-28 Thread James Mills
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:39:10AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote: Hi, Is TStringList.indexOf case sensitive or

Re: [fpc-pascal]2 questions on ansistrings

2003-08-28 Thread Marco van de Voort
1. If a segment is deleted from an ansistring, e.g. ... s := 'abcdefghijklmnop'; delete (s, 5, 6); yielding s = 'abcdelmnop' ...does the system shift the 'lmnop' to the left, or does the string get hooked together with pointers, thus saving much time with long strings? No shifting,

Re: [fpc-pascal]TStringList.indexOf (case-sensitivity)

2003-08-28 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:39:10AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote: Hi,

Re: [fpc-pascal]2 questions on ansistrings

2003-08-28 Thread Marco van de Voort
yielding s = 'abcdelmnop' ...does the system shift the 'lmnop' to the left, or does the string get hooked together with pointers, thus saving much time with long strings? No shifting, ansistrings are not sparse (at least not in this implementation. should be: It does shifting, but

[fpc-pascal]ICS for FPC 1.1

2003-08-28 Thread Marco van de Voort
After years of playing to get ICS running under FPC/win32, the 1.1.x compiler is finally getting so stable that the only remaining differences are minor ones. So minor, that the author of ICS has decided to merge them into the main distribution over time. Currently FPC compiles the few console

[fpc-pascal]Lazarus

2003-08-28 Thread Renato Borges A. Prado
The www.lazarus.freepascal.org has been down for a while, does anyone know what exactly what happened? []'s Renato - Original Message - From: Marco van de Voort [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:25 AM Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]2 questions on

Re: [fpc-pascal]ICS for FPC 1.1

2003-08-28 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:51:41PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote: After years of playing to get ICS running under FPC/win32, the 1.1.x compiler is finally getting so stable that the only remaining differences are minor ones. So minor, that the

Re: [fpc-pascal]Lazarus

2003-08-28 Thread James Mills
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 04:08:44PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote: The www.lazarus.freepascal.org has been down for a while, does anyone know what exactly what happened? Some hacker activity, and the owner wanted to reinstall to make sure that they were entirely gone. That's so pathetic.

[fpc-pascal]More strangeness...

2003-08-28 Thread L D Blake
Why is it that if I compile an FPC program with range checking turned on, opening any HTML file in ie immediately causes Error 201 from my FPC program? --- L D Blake ___ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [fpc-pascal]More strangeness...

2003-08-28 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, L D Blake wrote: Why is it that if I compile an FPC program with range checking turned on, opening any HTML file in ie immediately causes Error 201 from my FPC program? Ahem. A litlle bit more information may be in order here ? What kind of program is this ? What units