[fpc-pascal]FPC Version 1.9.4 released.

2004-06-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
Hello, The FPC team is pleased to announce that version 1.9.4 has been uploaded on the web. Version 1.9.4 is a pre-release of the upcoming version 2.0. However, the FPC team believes that the quality is sufficient for production work: version 1.9.4 scores significantly better in the testsuite

Re: [fpc-pascal]FPC Version 1.9.4 released.

2004-06-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, IoDream wrote: Hi, May I assume MultiThreading issues are gone. Multithreading is implemented. And PIC (Position Independant Code) generation is working too ? No. See the roadmap: scheduled for 1.9.6 It was the biggest hurdle to generate dynamic libraries on Linux

Re: [fpc-pascal]FPC Version 1.9.4 released.

2004-06-02 Thread James Mills
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:40:38PM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: And PIC (Position Independant Code) generation is working too ? No. See the roadmap: scheduled for 1.9.6 Excuse me ignorance. I don't beleive I know what PIC is... What is PIC ? cheers James -- -ShortCircuit Services

[fpc-pascal]Mac OS X - Graph unit?

2004-06-02 Thread Jeff Weeks
Does FPC support the graph unit on OSX? How do I get programs to compile? Thanks! Jeff ___ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal]Mac OS X - Graph unit?

2004-06-02 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 2 jun 2004, at 22:57, Jeff Weeks wrote: Does FPC support the graph unit on OSX? No, not yet. A graph unit for Mac OS X will probably be built on top of SDL. Jonas ___ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [fpc-pascal]Linux - Graph unit?

2004-06-02 Thread Jeff Weeks
The other platform I can use is Red Hat Linux 7.1 The following happened while compiling the maze example application. Do I need to compile this from a graphical terminal? I was using SSH. Or am I missing something? Thanks! Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] pascal]# fpc maze.pp Free Pascal Compiler

Re: [fpc-pascal]Linux - Graph unit?

2004-06-02 Thread Olaf Leidinger
Hello! The following happened while compiling the maze example application. Do I need to compile this from a graphical terminal? I was using SSH. This is no problem at all. But you must run it on a local machine in a terminal (not from X) Or am I missing something? Yes, you need libsvga

Re: [fpc-pascal]Linux - Graph unit?

2004-06-02 Thread Jeff Weeks
Thank you guys! You're very helpful! I downloaded the rpm and typed: #rpm -i svgalib-1.4.1-2.src.rpm I don't think this is how this type of RPM gets installed it's a source RPM I take it? It didn't give any errors but didn't fix my compile problem, either. Sorry for asking a Linux

Re: [fpc-pascal]Linux - Graph unit?

2004-06-02 Thread Marco van de Voort
I downloaded the rpm and typed: #rpm -i svgalib-1.4.1-2.src.rpm I don't think this is how this type of RPM gets installed it's a source RPM I take it? No. source rpm usually have srpm as extension. It didn't give any errors but didn't fix my compile problem, either. Then it only

Re: [fpc-pascal]Linux - Graph unit?

2004-06-02 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Jeff Weeks wrote: Thank you guys! You're very helpful! I downloaded the rpm and typed: #rpm -i svgalib-1.4.1-2.src.rpm I don't think this is how this type of RPM gets installed it's a source RPM I take it? It didn't give any errors but didn't fix my

[fpc-pascal]Unit Linux under Win32?

2004-06-02 Thread Ivan Stamenkovic
Hello, I have tried to compile an example from 'Free Pascal supplied units: Ref. Guide', Chapter 18 - The Sockets Unit, Program Client, but failed to compile. This example uses Linux unit, but both a command line compiler and IDE do not compile that unit. I have tried to Build from IDE, ppc386

Re: [fpc-pascal]Linux - Graph unit? SUCCESS!

2004-06-02 Thread Jeff Weeks
Thanks, everyone. I had to download the source... couldn't get the RPMs to work. But after compiling I followed your link instructions and voila... Thanks, again. Success feels good. 8^) Jeff On Jun 2, 2004, at 12:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Jeff Weeks wrote: Thank