Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

2017-05-13 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2017-05-13 18:02, Jon Foster wrote: Speaking of Java ... that's a hard comparison to make. There are so many Java implementations. Doesn't IBM, Linux, FreeBSD etc use OpenJDK? I was also under the impression that Oracle now also uses OpenJDK as the base for their releases - with some of

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

2017-05-13 Thread Jon Foster
On 05/12/2017 03:43 AM, Michael Schnell wrote: On 12.05.2017 01:57, Jon Foster wrote: One of the last set of benchmarks I did that focused on integer math and procedure call speed came out as follows: Thanks for sharing ! You're welcome. pascal:2:09s - 2:12 js (JIT): 2:23s -

Re: [fpc-pascal] mssqlconn.ppu on darwin

2017-05-13 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 13/05/17 16:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote: The unit mssqlconn is not compiled on FPC 3.0.2/3.0.3 on Darwin. Why? My policy for Darwin is to only compile units that have been tested by someone. Shipping a ton of untested units only because they compile mostly results in a lot of frustration

[fpc-pascal] mssqlconn.ppu on darwin

2017-05-13 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Hi, The unit mssqlconn is not compiled on FPC 3.0.2/3.0.3 on Darwin. Why? Mattias ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Size of program vs library ?

2017-05-13 Thread fredvs
Hello. Sorry to come back with this story but there are (good) news. Using *--gc-sections* makes the library smartlinked. So the question is: Why FPC does not provide *--gc-sections* to the linker with the -XX paramer for libraries ? (Bug ?) Fre;D - Many thanks ;-) -- View this

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

2017-05-13 Thread Michael Schnell
On 12.05.2017 01:57, Jon Foster wrote: One of the last set of benchmarks I did that focused on integer math and procedure call speed came out as follows: Thanks for sharing ! pascal:2:09s - 2:12 js (JIT): 2:23s - 2:27 python: 36:43s - 37:02 Funny that JS (Text) with