On 2017-11-30 23:55, kardan wrote:
In your case it would be probably enough to
sha256sum $FILES > SHA256SUMS.txt
gpg --sign SHA256SUMS.txt
Yup, that's exactly what I had in mind too. Thanks for sharing.
Regards,
Graeme
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:26:31 +0100
"Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> Checksums may indeed be created / calculated rather easily. However,
> that is not enough. The checksums must get to the end user in secured
> way as well, otherwise it makes no sense. What is the appropriate
>
On 2017-11-30 23:35, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Obviously, there are more secure mechanisms (let's take
Debian packages with their signatures as an example), but these require
more overhead (especially with different release makers for different
Not every release maker needs to create there own
On 2017-11-30 23:35, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Sorry, I know that this is being done, but I don't see how is that more
secure than just downloading the file via HTTPS.
Not all files are downloaded via a secure protocol like HTTPS. That's
true for FreeBSD, Linux and I would guess even for Free
On Fri, December 1, 2017 00:18, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2017-11-30 22:26, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> Checksums may indeed be created / calculated rather easily. However,
>> that
>> is not enough. The checksums must get to the end user in secured way as
>> well, otherwise it makes no sense.
>
>
>
On 2017-11-30 22:26, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Checksums may indeed be created / calculated rather easily. However, that
is not enough. The checksums must get to the end user in secured way as
well, otherwise it makes no sense.
As the saying goes... Take a page from the playbook of FreeBSD or any
On Thu, November 30, 2017 22:46, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2017-11-30 14:47, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> Sourceforge provides HTTPS access, that should be safe enough. Apart
>> from
>> that - no, checksums are not being created as part of the release
>> process
>> at the moment.
>>
>> Tomas
>
> That
On 2017-11-30 14:47, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Sourceforge provides HTTPS access, that should be safe enough. Apart from
that - no, checksums are not being created as part of the release process
at the moment.
Tomas
That really should be fixed. As someone that has many many releases is
my years, in
On 2017-11-29 23:37, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
I believe that the real problem is to find Object Pascal programmers
comparing with other languages.
True, there is less, but we (our company) still manages to find and
employ those with suitable Object Pascal skills. We have around 50
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:37:25 -0500
Paul Breneman wrote:
> Will fpcupdeluxe work on console, or is a GUI required?
fpcupdelux fails without DISPLAY.
> See fpcup usage here:
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/Small_Virtual_Machines#Debian_console_virtual_machine
On 11/30/2017 04:55 AM, kardan wrote:
I guess its better to go for fpcupdeluxe these days?
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 01:57:54 +0100
kardan wrote:
Is it possible to tell fpcgui a folder with an already checked out svn
trunk? I cannot afford to download 1.1 gb again.
use git-svn
On Thu, November 30, 2017 15:32, kardan wrote:
> Wow, both of you managed to avoid my actual question. :)
>
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:00:07 +0100
> kardan wrote:
>
>> How can I verify those downloads with shasum or gpg fingerprints)?
>> (FTP and HTTP seem not to be the safest
Wow, both of you managed to avoid my actual question. :)
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:00:07 +0100
kardan wrote:
> How can I verify those downloads with shasum or gpg fingerprints)?
> (FTP and HTTP seem not to be the safest ways these days.)
Kardan
In our previous episode, Pierre Muller said:
> > Thanks for the release in progress!
> > Please also update
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/readme.txt/download
>
> I did this a few minutes ago.
>
> But I am not sure all releases available on ftp are also available on
>
Le 30/11/2017 à 13:00, kardan a écrit :
> Thanks for the release in progress!
> Please also update
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/readme.txt/download
I did this a few minutes ago.
But I am not sure all releases available on ftp are also available on
SourceForge...
In our previous episode, kardan said:
> How can I verify those downloads with shasum or gpg fingerprints)? (FTP
> and HTTP seem not to be the safest ways these days.)
>
> > Changes that may break backwards compatibility will be documented at:
> > http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3_0_4
>
>
Thanks for the release in progress!
How can I verify those downloads with shasum or gpg fingerprints)? (FTP
and HTTP seem not to be the safest ways these days.)
> Changes that may break backwards compatibility will be documented at:
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3_0_4
"T.B.D."
>
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> > Finally, the Free Pascal 3.0.4 release is available from our FTP servers.
> >
> > Changes that may break backwards compatibility will be documented at:
> > http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3_0_4
>
> That should be
>
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> > and sourceforge
> >
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/
>
> This
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/Mac%20OS%20X/3.0.4/
> contains a fpc 3.0.5 as well.
>
> Is this on purpose?
Yes, ios comes from a special
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:23 AM, LacaK wrote:
>
>>> the idea) a rewrite of a multi-million lines of code project into C#,
>>> rather
>>> than move to open source development tools where they can keep the huge
>>> code
>>> base, the same language and reuse the same development
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> For Downloads, please use the FTP server at
>
> ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/fpc/dist/3.0.4/
Not sure why Marco decided to redirect everything to the stack.nl mirror
as primary source in his announcement, but everything should be on
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:04:31 +0100 (CET)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
>[...]
> and sourceforge
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/
This
https://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/Mac%20OS%20X/3.0.4/
contains a fpc 3.0.5 as well.
Is this on purpose?
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:04:31 +0100 (CET)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Finally, the Free Pascal 3.0.4 release is available from our FTP servers.
>
> Changes that may break backwards compatibility will be documented at:
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3_0_4
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:04:31 +0100 (CET)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Finally, the Free Pascal 3.0.4 release is available from our FTP servers.
>
> Changes that may break backwards compatibility will be documented at:
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3_0_4
>
Hello,
Finally, the Free Pascal 3.0.4 release is available from our FTP servers.
Changes that may break backwards compatibility will be documented at:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3_0_4
For Downloads, please use the FTP server at
ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/fpc/dist/3.0.4/
and
I guess its better to go for fpcupdeluxe these days?
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 01:57:54 +0100
kardan wrote:
> Is it possible to tell fpcgui a folder with an already checked out svn
> trunk? I cannot afford to download 1.1 gb again.
use git-svn with existing trunk folder
26 matches
Mail list logo