On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 03:19:55 +0200, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
wrote:
>In Delphi objects are deprecated
Huh?
ObjectPascal deprecating objects?
Sounds far-fetched.
--
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Ryan Joseph schrieb am Fr., 17. Aug. 2018,
18:22:
>
>
> > On Aug 16, 2018, at 8:55 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > It shouldn't be hard. Feel free to provide a patch together with some
> tests and it will be taken under consideration.
>
> So the
I had some free time recently so I decided as a learning experience to fork the
compiler and implement the “auto var” idea that was mentioned a few weeks ago.
What I found is that it’s a pretty lightweight (in terms of impact on the
compiler) and unintrusive way to manage memory on a per-scope
2018-08-17 17:48 GMT+02:00 Ryan Joseph :
> So the reason that objects/classes in FPC don’t have operators in the
> class (like advanced records) is for Delphi compatibility? That would be
> great if operators were unified across records/classes.
>
In Delphi (NEXTGEN for mobile platforms and
> On Aug 16, 2018, at 8:55 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> It shouldn't be hard. Feel free to provide a patch together with some tests
> and it will be taken under consideration.
So the reason that objects/classes in FPC don’t have operators in the class
(like advanced records)
Il 17/08/2018 15:46, Marco Borsari via fpc-pascal ha scritto:
I found
that someone made that for me at link
http://www.mindfruit.co.uk/2012/01/switch-blocks-jump-tables.html
and I have tried to rewrite the program in at syntax
Il 16/08/2018 17:40, Giuliano Colla ha scritto:
The first thing I notice is that you load BX, which is a 16 bit register
(the lower 16 bits of EBX), with the value of "next", and then Jump to
the content of EBX which is a 32 bit register, whose lower 16 bits have
been loaded but whose upper 16
