Ryan Joseph schrieb am Mo., 7. Okt. 2019, 00:16:
>
> >
> >>> 3.
> >>> timpfuncspez2.pp
> >>> DoThis
> >>> DoThis
> >>> Delphi gives an error "Ambiguous call to DoThis". FPC silently
> >>> selects the one with only one param. IMO this is dangerous, it
> >>> should give an error.
> >
> > generic
> On Oct 6, 2019, at 5:42 PM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> I meant:
>
> generic procedure DoThis(param1: T; param2: word = 100);
> begin
> end;
That works then. Added a test:
{$mode objfpc}
{$modeswitch implicitfunctionspecialization}
program timpfuncspez15;
generic
> On Oct 6, 2019, at 5:40 PM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
>> Which test? Please post a sample.
>
> generic procedure DoThis(a:T; b:T);
> begin end;
>
> begin
> DoThis(1,200); // 1 sets T to shortint, so the 200 gives a warning
> end;
>
What is the preferred behavior? I’m
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:10:54 -0400
Ryan Joseph wrote:
> > On Oct 6, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Ryan Joseph
> > wrote:
> >> On Oct 6, 2019, at 2:06 PM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> 1.
> >> FPC allows default params, Delphi does not. Nice.
> >> I see no tests for this though, so
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:03:10 -0400
Ryan Joseph wrote:
>[...]
> > 2.
> > DoThis(1,200) gives range check warning instead of error. A warning
> > means there are some rare cases, where this code is correct. Is
> > this a todo or do you see a useful case?
>
> Which test? Please post a sample.
> On Oct 6, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
>
>> On Oct 6, 2019, at 2:06 PM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal
>> wrote:
>>
>> 1.
>> FPC allows default params, Delphi does not. Nice.
>> I see no tests for this though, so maybe this was not on purpose?
>
> Probably an oversight if you
Thanks for testing. I don’t have access to Delphi so I need help to make it
Delphi compatible.
> On Oct 6, 2019, at 2:06 PM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> 1.
> FPC allows default params, Delphi does not. Nice.
> I see no tests for this though, so maybe this was not on purpose?
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:23:57 -0400
Ryan Joseph wrote:
> > On Oct 6, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal
> > wrote:
> >
> > Ryan, is patch_3_25.diff the latest patch?
> >
> > I get a lot of merge conflicts.
> > What fpc revision is needed for this?
> >
> > And what is the git
> On Oct 6, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> Ryan, is patch_3_25.diff the latest patch?
>
> I get a lot of merge conflicts.
> What fpc revision is needed for this?
>
> And what is the git repo
> https://github.com/genericptr/freepascal/tree/generic_implicit
>
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 11:10:22 -0400
Ryan Joseph wrote:
> > On Oct 3, 2019, at 6:07 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> > wrote:
> >
> > A patch for it by Ryan Joseph exists
> > ( https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35261 ), but I've not yet
> > found the time to review it.
>
> I’m eager to use
10 matches
Mail list logo
