Hi,
I also think this would be useful, but for other reasons, often times I end up
with code like the following:
With BigLongThingIDontWantToWriteOutEverySingleTime do
begin
Height := 100;
Width := 200;
...
it complex if
there are 2 or more subject in the with?
2013/3/17 Daniel Gaspary dgasp...@gmail.com
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:02 PM, 印場 乃亜 shir...@galapagossoftware.com wrote:
With BigLongThingIDontWantToWriteOutEverySingleTime do
begin
Height := 100;
Width := 200
Hi,
On 2013/03/17, at 11:37, Flávio Etrusco flavio.etru...@gmail.com wrote:
No, he's saying that *his hack* using class helper wouldn't cover this
case (two objects in the same 'with' clause).
Well, more to the point, it only works with OOP. I use WITH on structures,
etc. all the time, so
Hi,
On 2013/02/19, at 22:53, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
Does a unit- rather than something it contains- have any sort of
representation which is recognisably distinct from an object?
Maybe. But what it certain doesn't have is
Hi,
I also always use .pas, but the idea of using .pp for sources only intended to
compile in FPK and .pas for more portable source code is interesting.
The only problem is there is no free Delphi for me to test with anymore, right?
Since FreePascal works on nearly every platform, I don't
Joao,
I think you had better be careful what you say. Someone will rename their
entire /usr/bin directory and wonder why the system stops working!
You can rename executables you create, but don't change the names of standard
ones!
Anyway you can tell what programs unix will *try* to run
Hi,
On 2013/02/28, at 9:16, Simon Kissel sc...@untergrund.net wrote:
I still believe FPC should leave the delphi compatible idea, or
clearly state that it means compatible with Delphi 7 for legacy
purposes and nothing newer. Then innovate the rest of the language on
its own in a Pascal-like
Hi,
Wow I am surprised this is continuing so long - I take it other people have
interest in the subject too.
On 2012/10/30, at 17:08, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior jagf...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/10/30 印場 乃亜 shir...@galapagossoftware.com:
Hi,
Wow, Class Factories - I am having nightmarish
Hi,
I will take a look at WST and see how it fits. Thanks for the tip.
Thank you,
Noah Silva
On 2012/10/29, at 18:43, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, 印場 乃亜 wrote:
Greetings,
I am familiar with the basic underlying methods available
the capabilities of the real units before asking more.
Mainly my question was asking if there is a standard way to do this, since it
seems like a common thing to need to do.
Thank you,
Noah Silva
On 2012/10/29, at 18:00, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:52 AM, 印場 乃亜 shir
into a string or
stream then pass that resulting string/stream to the simple ipc
components.
That will do what you are asking, without much fuss...
2012/10/30 印場 乃亜 shir...@galapagossoftware.com:
Hi,
I read about MSGPACK before, but it seems to be a binary version of JSON,
right?
I
Greetings,
I am familiar with the basic underlying methods available for transferring data
between processes on Windows and Unix, i.e. Pipes, Shared memory, and TCP/IP -
but what I am not familiar with is any higher level functionality that may be
available on FPC.
As an example: I have
Hi,
Even for me (and I have installed FPC / Lazarus on Mac like 100 times now),
things are mysterious sometimes.
I upgraded my 10.7 laptop to 10.8, and the existing lazarus/ FPC, and XCode
continued to work fine, despite reading various places that upon upgrading, the
Unix Tools would be
Hi,
I am sure the ones included in FCL are much fancier and know OOP, etc. I have
a relatively primitive one used here too:
https://github.com/GalapagosAdmin/PasViz
I just use it for analyzing unit dependencies, so I don't need too many fancy
features. Also, I didn't write the parser, and
Hi,
Does anyone know if the version of OnGuard listed below is working on OS X? I
started customizing it myself to work on OS X, but due to lack of time, I
haven't finished. (It compiled, but not everything works 100% yet).
If they don't have it working, perhaps I should contribute my
Hi,
...
-
This is funny to remember today. ;-)
When i run BP 7 on 80286 computers, and then compared with size and speed of
TP 5.5 - i was sure as hell that OOP is for lazy programmers, who cannot
make code fast and small.
And i remember comparing speed of Virtual Pascal and
Hi,
On 2012/08/31, at 2:51, Jürgen Hestermann juergen.hesterm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 2012-08-30 18:29, schrieb Ralf A. Quint:
Pascal has evolved since Wirth's original design back in the 70s
This is true. But there are two aspects of the Pascal extensions of the last
years (decades) that
Hi,
On 2012/05/12, at 18:31, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Noah Silva schrieb:
Thus, the only question would be whether you have to manually convert a
UnicodeString to a UTF8String or not.
No, that would not help. Under Windows you can access long paths *only* when
using special functions
18 matches
Mail list logo
