On 12/5/19 18:21, Luca Olivetti wrote:
With that last case, aren't you just defining one bit in the bitpacked
record?
In that case
Thanks Luca, the case was the problem, I wanted a bitpacked record of
word, this was a silly copy / paste error.
--
Victor Campillo
El 12/5/19 a les 17:58, Victor Campillo ha escrit:
Hi,
I think I found a bug with bitpackeds records.
I have the next record.
TBitpacked = packed record
Case Integer Of
0 : (Word : Word);
1 : (Byte : array [0..1] of Byte);
2 : (Boolean: bitpacked Array [0..15]
On 12/5/19 18:36, Jeppe Johansen wrote:
With this layout bit0 to bit15 will all point to bit0. You probably
didn't mean to do the case inside the bitpacked record
Yes, you are right, I don't want the case there, copy/paste error.
One hour looking that record declaration and I could not point
On 5/12/19 5:58 PM, Victor Campillo wrote:
case integer of
0: (bit0: Boolean);
1: (bit1: Boolean);
2: (bit2: Boolean);
3: (bit3: Boolean);
4: (bit4: Boolean);
5: (bit5: Boolean);
6: (bit6: Boolean);
Hi,
I think I found a bug with bitpackeds records.
I have the next record.
TBitpacked = packed record
Case Integer Of
0 : (Word : Word);
1 : (Byte : array [0..1] of Byte);
2 : (Boolean: bitpacked Array [0..15] of boolean);
3 : (Bit : bitpacked Record
