You may also install Lazarus.exe via wine.
With the SeupLazarus.exe, it install fpc.exe too ;-)
-
Many thanks ;-)
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Cross-compile-vs-native-tp5720834p5720891.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing
On 01/27/2015 10:27 PM, Ewald wrote:
- Without the target system, the application cannot be tested ..
This is true, only because remote debugging is not well supported.
In fact I sometimes to programs to be run on a headless system (e.g. a
NAS) Here you can't install Lazarus, because you
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/27/2015 10:27 PM, Ewald wrote:
- Without the target system, the application cannot be tested ..
This is true, only because remote debugging is not well supported.
In fact I sometimes to programs to be run on a headless system (e.g. a
NAS) Here you can't
On 01/28/2015 12:51 PM, Ewald wrote:
[this might be an extremely silly proposition, please forgive me] Why
don't you run lazarus through ssh? Or use vnc?
The (small) target system does not have any graphic-related stuff like
X, qt or gtk. So VNC, or remote X will not work.
Of course I can
On 01/28/2015 10:01 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/27/2015 10:27 PM, Ewald wrote:
- Without the target system, the application cannot be tested ..
This is true, only because remote debugging is not well supported.
For remote debugging a target system is needed as well? So even if
remote
Hello.
I do main development on Linux 64.
For Windows, i use wine on Linux 64, (fpc.exe 32/64 installed without
problem) and compile the source via wine-fpc.exe.
The advantage is that you do not have to copy your source to a virtual
machine or a other native Windows.
And you may test your exe
A question to those who must maintain a Linux version and a Windows versions
application.
Do you tend to cross-compile from Linux or do you compile native (with
separate projects) on each OS (Linux and Windows)?
Thanks
Brian
--
View this message in context:
On 01/27/2015 09:56 PM, Brian wrote:
A question to those who must maintain a Linux version and a Windows versions
application.
Do you tend to cross-compile from Linux or do you compile native (with
separate projects) on each OS (Linux and Windows)?
Native, because of two reasons:
-
Do you tend to cross-compile from Linux or do you compile native (with
separate projects) on each OS (Linux and Windows)?
Cross compile from Linux. I can use Wine to test Windows compatiblity and I
don't have Windows anyway :D
--
View this message in context:
Native on Windows, cross-compile for Linux.
-Original Message-
From: Brian
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:56 PM
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: [fpc-pascal] Cross-compile vs native
A question to those who must maintain a Linux version and a Windows versions
On 2015-01-27 20:56, Brian wrote:
Do you tend to cross-compile from Linux or do you compile native (with
separate projects) on each OS (Linux and Windows)?
In my experience I found that having various VM's for each target works
best. The least amount of hassle, and all VM's sync the source
11 matches
Mail list logo
