Am Sonntag, den 21.08.2005, 16:19 -0700 schrieb L505:
The first compilers were written in assembly language. This allowed
for
the next generation compilers to be written in a high level language.
And the assembly language was just magically inserted into the memory
with that magic
Marc Santhoff wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 21.08.2005, 16:19 -0700 schrieb L505:
The first compilers were written in assembly language. This allowed
for
the next generation compilers to be written in a high level language.
And the assembly language was just magically
Am Montag, den 22.08.2005, 14:12 +0200 schrieb Anton Tichawa:
Marc Santhoff wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 21.08.2005, 16:19 -0700 schrieb L505:
The first compilers were written in assembly language. This allowed
for
the next generation compilers to be written in a high
L505 wrote:
I know nothing about the first program, executed by the first computer,
if that's what you are asking, but I guess it was probably written by
hand in machine language.
That leads to the first program that ran the first software program
actually being a hardware program. The
I know nothing about the first program, executed by the first computer,
if that's what you are asking, but I guess it was probably written by
hand in machine language.
That leads to the first program that ran the first software program actually
being a hardware program. The
Most programmers today
see some API or platform as their working base, which is IMHO like
standing on a cloud - they don't see the transistors etc. Would they
be capable to build a computer from scratch? A mechanical cash register?
A hydraulic-based computer?
But you can't make money with that
Matt Emson wrote:
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
Cygwin runs exclusively on Windows machines... FPC has a Windows port.
Whilst I can see the point
Same applies to gcc ;) Without an older gcc you can't build a new one
except using a propritary compiler.
But where did that proprietary compiler come from? Hardware based?
Molecules, Ions, and atoms?
i.e. the answer to the big bang theory, the answer to religion, etc.
L505 wrote:
Same applies to gcc ;) Without an older gcc you can't build a new one
except using a propritary compiler.
But where did that proprietary compiler come from? Hardware based?
Molecules, Ions, and atoms?
i.e. the answer to the big bang theory, the answer to religion, etc.
L505 wrote:
Same applies to gcc ;) Without an older gcc you can't build a new one
except using a propritary compiler.
But where did that proprietary compiler come from? Hardware based?
Molecules, Ions, and atoms?
i.e. the answer to the big bang theory, the answer to religion, etc.
The first compilers were written in assembly language. This allowed
for
the next generation compilers to be written in a high level language.
And the assembly language was just magically inserted into the memory
with that magic script?
At some point it comes to a hardware etching level, I'm
L505 wrote:
The first compilers were written in assembly language. This allowed
for
the next generation compilers to be written in a high level language.
And the assembly language was just magically inserted into the memory
with that magic script?
At some point it comes to a
Hi there,
Is there some 2.0 fpc release for cygwin?
If no, How can I build it starting from the scratch?
tia!
best regards
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi there,
Is there some 2.0 fpc release for cygwin?
If no, How can I build it starting from the scratch?
There is no release. If you want to start a cygwin special the best way is
to start with a unix target and adapt it for cygwin. Things like opening
files etc. all need to be done through
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
Hi there,
Is there some 2.0 fpc release for cygwin?
If no, How can I build it starting from the scratch?
There
Jose Pascual wrote:
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
IIRC, fpc 1.0.0 can be made with turbo pascal 7.
Vincent.
On 16 aug 2005, at 20:24, Jose Pascual wrote:
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
No.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
Cygwin runs exclusively on Windows machines... FPC has a Windows port.
Whilst I can see the point of a port to Cygwin, I
Okey,
but I think that the first stage for make fpc is to compiling some asm
or c files using binutils, right?
so in cygwin I have binutils, even gcc, how I shoud to do to create
first fpc from ASMs or Cs files?
On 16 aug 2005, at 20:24, Jose Pascual wrote:
Is there some posibility to
On 16 aug 2005, at 21:44, Jose Pascual wrote:
Okey,
but I think that the first stage for make fpc is to compiling some asm
or c files using binutils, right?
No, FPC is entirely written in Pascal (just like gcc is written in C
and not in assembler). The original bootstrap was with Turbo
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Jose Pascual wrote:
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
IIRC, fpc 1.0.0 can be made with turbo
Okey,
but I think that the first stage for make fpc is to compiling some asm
or c files using binutils, right?
Incorrect.
so in cygwin I have binutils, even gcc, how I shoud to do to create
first fpc from ASMs or Cs files?
You can't, FPC is written in pascal.
By the way, how would one compile Pascal code without a Pascal
compiler? No
magic script file will avoid the need for fpc.
I asked this question on C2 wiki once..
I guess you could start by hardcoding a binary program from scratch in a
text editor with your bare hands. Then you have the
No, FPC is entirely written in Pascal (just like gcc is written in C
and not in assembler). The original bootstrap was with Turbo Pascal,
but TP compatibility has been dropped a long time ago. It must be
bootstrapped with itself now.
Neato.. offtopic but if anyone wondered, the delphi
L505 wrote:
Neato.. offtopic but if anyone wondered, the delphi compiler is
originated from borland C++ as far as my tools told me.
Yes, actually DCC32 is written in C++. Only the Delphi IDE is written in
Delphi. FPC and Lazarus are both written in FPC :)
25 matches
Mail list logo
