Andreas Berger wrote:
I have two Prolific 2303 serial converters without problems. There is
native USB support in the kernel (2.6.17). I have run them at 38400. I am
interested in your problems - maybe I can prevent some future problem.
Does anyone know about USB-to-Serial for DOS? I
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
EPROM blaster, but obviously that sort of thing wouldn't work where the
physical
device types differed.
Actually, I use DOS directly. I use cheap off-the-shelf motherboard for
an embedded system that our company uses. The motherboard talks the the
system
Andreas Berger wrote:
My own feeling if you /have/ to have a DOS environment and don't mean
something like the '98 DOS box would be to see if you could run the code
under either DosEmu or Qemu, both of which allow guest session ports to
be mapped to whatever hardware is supported by the
Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 14:03 schrieb Andreas Berger:
My problem is that there are cheap motherboards appearing
that no longer have serial ports. I'm afraid that soon none will.
Therefore I am looking for alternatives.
I'm running also a DOS Program and now it is ported to Linux.
Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 18:57 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
The best USB-serial Interfaces for Linux are the ones with FTDI Chip
inside. http://www.ftdichip.com/
http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/EvaluationKits/USB-Serial.htm
Do they have the same latency as a normal serial port?
The best USB-serial Interfaces for Linux are the ones with FTDI Chip inside.
http://www.ftdichip.com/
http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/EvaluationKits/USB-Serial.htm
Rainer
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
The best USB-serial Interfaces for Linux are the ones with FTDI Chip inside.
http://www.ftdichip.com/
http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/EvaluationKits/USB-Serial.htm
Do they have the same latency as a normal serial port? I've tried several
usb-serial ports, and they all have horrible latencies
Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 18:57 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
The best USB-serial Interfaces for Linux are the ones with FTDI Chip
inside. http://www.ftdichip.com/
http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/EvaluationKits/USB-Serial.htm
Do they have the same latency as a normal serial port? I've
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:23:56 +0100
Rainer Stratmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We tried USB converters with prolific chipset and it hangs up then, so
FTDI chips would be better. I read also somewhere a lack of latency.
May be it is also a question of the Kerneldriver and the driver will
improve
We tried USB converters with prolific chipset and it hangs up then, so
FTDI chips would be better. I read also somewhere a lack of latency.
May be it is also a question of the Kerneldriver and the driver will
improve more in the future.
I have two Prolific 2303 serial converters without
10 matches
Mail list logo
