Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or
C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
AFAIK, Lua uses automatically generated plain C binding.
When I looked at it, the binding generator consisted of
the following parts:
1) A C++-based program to parse C++
On Wednesday 01 of February 2012 21:02:38 Vladimir Zhirov wrote:
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or
C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
AFAIK, Lua uses automatically generated plain C binding.
When I looked at it, the binding generator
On 1/30/2012 03:26, zeljko wrote:
On Monday 30 of January 2012 08:35:23 waldo kitty wrote:
i may have easily misunderstood the OP's post... i tend to read in literan
english format... ie: if you say eggs are round, that is where i base my
response unless it is very obvious that there is
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Krzysztof wrote:
Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if FPC does not
(fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries there are
plans to support it? This will be great
There are no plans to support it, since every C++ compiler uses it's own
On Monday 30 of January 2012 08:35:23 waldo kitty wrote:
i may have easily misunderstood the OP's post... i tend to read in literan
english format... ie: if you say eggs are round, that is where i base my
response unless it is very obvious that there is something else to consider
which i point
waldo kitty wrote:
On 1/29/2012 17:38, Lars wrote:
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
:( i don't nderstand why one would want to apply interpreted script
languages,
al la BASIC, to today's tasks...
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Lars nore...@z505.com wrote:
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
No idea, but Python, ruby, lua and php do not generate real programs
Am 30.01.2012 07:53 schrieb zeljko zel...@holobit.net:
On Sunday 29 of January 2012 22:16:45 Krzysztof wrote:
Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if FPC does not
(fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries there are
plans to support it? This will be great
On Monday 30 of January 2012 11:51:10 Den Jean wrote:
On Monday 30 January 2012 09:28:00 michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
There are no plans to support it, since every C++ compiler uses it's own
(incompatible) format, and G++ changes it format regularly, so I was
given to understand.
Eh, I meant how does ruby, lua, objective c, and similar
tools bind the
C++ api. Do they use an automatic tool that converts QT C++ objects to
procedural? or by hand, someone converts the objects to
procedures and structs? Or do they use the c++ objects
directly to python objects..
The
On Monday 30 of January 2012 14:27:10 Ludo Brands wrote:
Eh, I meant how does ruby, lua, objective c, and similar
tools bind the
C++ api. Do they use an automatic tool that converts QT C++ objects to
procedural? or by hand, someone converts the objects to
procedures and structs? Or do
On 01/30/12 02:19, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 29 January 2012 16:31, Jonas Maebe wrote:
GTK offers a plain C interface. QT only offers a C++ interface. FPC does not
(fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries. LibQT4Pas offers a
plain C interface to QT for use by FPC.
Can
It seems to me that you could compile qt4pas.c (or what ever the source
file(s) of libqt4pas.so is) into a qt4pas.o and just link them
statically with {$link qt4pas.o} which then would leave out the
requirement for libqt4pas.so to be distributed with any program using
the qt interface. The
On Monday 30 January 2012 23:08:36 Krzysztof wrote:
the qt interface. The gpl? license may or may not make that possible
the binding and Qt are LGPL
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On Monday 30 of January 2012 20:17:22 Andrew Haines wrote:
On 01/30/12 02:19, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 29 January 2012 16:31, Jonas Maebe wrote:
GTK offers a plain C interface. QT only offers a C++ interface. FPC does
not (fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries.
On 29 Jan 2012, at 15:29, Krzysztof wrote:
But why when I build application on
KDE interface I need some external libQT4Pas to run it and my friend
need it too (he have KDE so all QT librarys too)? There is no
libGTK4Pas so why exists layer libQT4Pas? What is difference between
GTK and QT
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Krzysztof wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering. If I build application for linux using gtk2 widgetset
for GNOME (or XFCE etc.) and send this program to my friend, then he
can run it without any external librarys (of course if he have gnome
too), this same thing on windows. But why
Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if FPC does not
(fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries there are
plans to support it? This will be great
2012/1/29 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Krzysztof wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering. If I
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
Krzysztof wrote:
Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if FPC does not
(fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries there are
plans to support it?
On 1/29/2012 17:38, Lars wrote:
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
:( i don't nderstand why one would want to apply interpreted script languages,
al la BASIC, to today's tasks... sure, these are neat and
On Sunday 29 of January 2012 22:16:45 Krzysztof wrote:
Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if FPC does not
(fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries there are
plans to support it? This will be great
Maybe it is possible (or will be possible) to use C++ class, but I
On Monday 30 of January 2012 03:28:45 waldo kitty wrote:
On 1/29/2012 17:38, Lars wrote:
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
:
:( i don't nderstand why one would want to apply interpreted script
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Lars nore...@z505.com wrote:
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
No idea, but Python, ruby, lua and php do not generate real programs
but instead are just scripts which run
On 29 January 2012 16:31, Jonas Maebe wrote:
GTK offers a plain C interface. QT only offers a C++ interface. FPC does not
(fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries. LibQT4Pas offers a
plain C interface to QT for use by FPC.
Can one statically bind the LibQt4Pas into a FPC
On 1/30/2012 01:55, zeljko wrote:
On Monday 30 of January 2012 03:28:45 waldo kitty wrote:
On 1/29/2012 17:38, Lars wrote:
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
:
:( i don't nderstand why one
25 matches
Mail list logo