Hi.
I just tried to unfairly compare fpc-compiled binary and gcc-compiled
binary under my Gentoo box. FPC is incredible. `ps` data shows the fpc
one costs nearly no memory? But I still notice it is a little slow. It
usually costs 0.5~1.0 time more than the gcc one. It seems as if fpc
saves memory
On 24 Sep 2009, at 10:31, 章宏九 wrote:
I just tried to unfairly compare fpc-compiled binary and gcc-compiled
binary under my Gentoo box. FPC is incredible. `ps` data shows the fpc
one costs nearly no memory?
The FPC run time library is much less extensive than the GNU C library
(e.g., it
2009/9/24 Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be:
On 24 Sep 2009, at 10:31, 章宏九 wrote:
I just tried to unfairly compare fpc-compiled binary and gcc-compiled
binary under my Gentoo box. FPC is incredible. `ps` data shows the fpc
one costs nearly no memory?
The FPC run time library is much
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 16:31 +0800, 章宏九 wrote:
Hi.
I just tried to unfairly compare fpc-compiled binary and gcc-compiled
binary under my Gentoo box. FPC is incredible. `ps` data shows the fpc
one costs nearly no memory? But I still notice it is a little slow. It
usually costs 0.5~1.0 time
On 24 Sep 2009, at 10:53, 章宏九 wrote:
2009/9/24 Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be:
I would like also to know the situation in C. (I mean
declaration of printf and scanf. Are they implemented in glibc or
gcc?)
In glibc.
Unlike pascal?
Yes and no. In both Pascal and C, the internal
Thank you very much.
2009/9/24 Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be:
On 24 Sep 2009, at 10:53, 章宏九 wrote:
2009/9/24 Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be:
I would like also to know the situation in C. (I mean
declaration of printf and scanf. Are they implemented in glibc or
gcc?)
In
In our previous episode, ? said:
I just tried to unfairly compare fpc-compiled binary and gcc-compiled
binary under my Gentoo box. FPC is incredible. `ps` data shows the fpc
one costs nearly no memory? But I still notice it is a little slow. It
usually costs 0.5~1.0 time more than the
