'
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] unexpected termination with no errors
Once I fixed my batch file I am getting exactly this:
An unhandled exception occurred at $004E4B4C:
EInOutError: Disk Full
$004E4B4C GETDATA, line 19078 of pastep.pas
$004E9695 GETAFILE, line 19997 of pastep.pas
go.
James
From: fpc-pascal On Behalf Of Gary
Doades
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 12:11 PM
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] unexpected termination with no errors
Windows represents exception codes as an unsigned int. The error -1073741819 is
actually
On Thu, 16 May 2019, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) schrieb am Mi., 15.
Mai 2019, 18:40:
Hi,
On Wed, 15 May 2019, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
(Sidenote: I've been pondering for a while if I should report this as a
bug. I think the RTL should put a
Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) schrieb am Mi., 15.
Mai 2019, 18:40:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2019, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
> >> (Sidenote: I've been pondering for a while if I should report this as a
> >> bug. I think the RTL should put a try-except around there, to show a
> >>
Hi,
On Wed, 15 May 2019, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
>> (Sidenote: I've been pondering for a while if I should report this as a
>> bug. I think the RTL should put a try-except around there, to show a
>> stacktrace on unhandled exceptions, just like the main thread dying
>> does, but who
they could be negative, but I'm
curious why this strange errorlevel.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: fpc-pascal On Behalf Of Karoly
Balogh (Charlie/SGR)
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 9:17 AM
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] unexpected termination with no errors
Hi
to treat anything less than
> zero as an error. so it doesn't really matter, I just didn't know they
> could be negative, but I'm curious why this strange errorlevel.
>
> Jim
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: fpc-pascal On Behalf Of
> Karoly Balogh (C
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] unexpected termination with no errors
Hi,
On Wed, 15 May 2019, James Richters wrote:
> Has anyone encountered anything like this before or know how I can
> make sure I always get the maximum amount of debugging info when my
> program crashes?
Is it a subthr
Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) schrieb am Mi., 15.
Mai 2019, 15:25:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2019, James Richters wrote:
>
> > Has anyone encountered anything like this before or know how I can make
> > sure I always get the maximum amount of debugging info when my program
> > crashes?
>
> Is it a
Hi,
On Wed, 15 May 2019, James Richters wrote:
> Has anyone encountered anything like this before or know how I can make
> sure I always get the maximum amount of debugging info when my program
> crashes?
Is it a subthreaded app?
The only case when I noticed something similar (under Linux
A program I have been working on for years has suddenly developed a bug in it
and at a certain point, it is just terminating and not giving me any runtime
errors or any error of any kind. It's just running running... running...
then BAM - GONE, no explanation%errorlevel% is
11 matches
Mail list logo
