On 09 May 2012, at 18:26, microc...@zoho.com wrote:
I didn't find a list of maintainers on the home page and I don't know how
Free Pascal development is organized. Hopefully the maintainer will speak up
and in the meantime I will look at the build guide you mentioned further
on.
There is
On Wed, May 9, 2012 18:26, microc...@zoho.com wrote:
From: Tomas Hajny
Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on Solaris and is there
a timeframe? Do you plan on continuing to support Solaris? I would be
interested in running both the Intel and SPARC versions if they come
available.
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
There are no binaries provided by my distribution. It's Slackware! But the
question was, was it really necessary to use such a recent glibc?
And what, pray, is wrong with Slackware? :-)
Most of the SPARC systems around here are Debian (plus one each of
Solaris 8
Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 18:26, microc...@zoho.com wrote:
From: Tomas Hajny
Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on Solaris and is there
a timeframe? Do you plan on continuing to support Solaris? I would be
interested in running both the Intel and SPARC versions if
On 05/09/2012 01:06 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
There are no binaries provided by my distribution. It's Slackware!
But the
question was, was it really necessary to use such a recent glibc?
And what, pray, is wrong with Slackware? :-)
Most of the SPARC systems
