Hi, I was looking to try FPC but I saw the latest release isn't available for
Solaris, only 2.4something. Do you guys plan on releasing the new version on
Solaris? Do you intend to keep supporting Solaris?
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Sorry if this is a duplicate. I sent it from my phone yesterday but it has
not shown up yet, possibly due to the html issue.
I was looking to try FPC and I downloaded the Linux version. I saw the
latest release isn't available for Solaris.
Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on
Hi, I was looking to try FPC but I saw the latest release
isn't available for Solaris, only 2.4something. Do you guys
plan on releasing the new version on Solaris? Do you intend
to keep supporting Solaris?
2.6.0 is available for intel from
On Wed, 9 May 2012 17:19:59 +0200
Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr wrote:
Hi, I was looking to try FPC but I saw the latest release
isn't available for Solaris, only 2.4something. Do you guys
plan on releasing the new version on Solaris? Do you intend
to keep supporting Solaris?
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2012 17:19:59 +0200
Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr wrote:
Hi, I was looking to try FPC but I saw the latest release
isn't available for Solaris, only 2.4something. Do you guys
plan on releasing the new version on Solaris? Do you intend
to keep
On 09 May 2012, at 17:46, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Is it (already) possible to use Unicodestrings for file paths?
Only if your current ansi code page supports the characters used in the
unicodestring. There are not unicodestring overloads yet in the RTL.
From: Tomas Hajny
Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on Solaris and is there
a timeframe? Do you plan on continuing to support Solaris? I would be
interested in running both the Intel and SPARC versions if they come
available.
I'm not the right one to answer this question but
On 09 May 2012, at 18:26, microc...@zoho.com wrote:
I didn't find a list of maintainers on the home page and I don't know how
Free Pascal development is organized. Hopefully the maintainer will speak up
and in the meantime I will look at the build guide you mentioned further
on.
There is
On Wed, May 9, 2012 18:26, microc...@zoho.com wrote:
From: Tomas Hajny
Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on Solaris and is there
a timeframe? Do you plan on continuing to support Solaris? I would be
interested in running both the Intel and SPARC versions if they come
available.
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
There are no binaries provided by my distribution. It's Slackware! But the
question was, was it really necessary to use such a recent glibc?
And what, pray, is wrong with Slackware? :-)
Most of the SPARC systems around here are Debian (plus one each of
Solaris 8
On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:10:06 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
There is a directory for Solaris SPARC but it is empty. Is it possible
to get 2.6.0 for Solaris SPARC? Thanks again.
I've got a copy that I've built and run here, but I started off with an
earlier version and had to jump through a
Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 18:26, microc...@zoho.com wrote:
From: Tomas Hajny
Do you guys plan on releasing the 2.6.0 version on Solaris and is there
a timeframe? Do you plan on continuing to support Solaris? I would be
interested in running both the Intel and SPARC versions if
On Wed, 9 May 2012 18:44:08 +0200 Jonas Maebe wrote:
There is no real Solaris maintainer. Pierre sometimes works on it and I
run nightly Solaris/SPARC regression tests (for as long as I still have
access to a Solaris/SPARC machine), but I definitely do not support the
platform. Solaris/SPARC
On Wed, 9 May 2012 19:02:16 +0200 (CEST) Tomas Hajny wrote:
My point was that there has been no official / dedicated maintainer for
that platform within the core team recently which is the reason why there
are no official builds for Solaris for version 2.6.0. Mark Morgan Lloyd
who already
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:10:06 + Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
There is a directory for Solaris SPARC but it is empty. Is it possible
to get 2.6.0 for Solaris SPARC? Thanks again.
I've got a copy that I've built and run here, but I started off with an
earlier version
Your question, as given unambiguously in the subject line, relates to
2.6.0. I'm telling you, equally unambiguously, that you don't
want to do
that. You might need to start off with an older binary to get
yourself
going, or you might be able to get hold of a binary for 2.6.0, but
Ludo Brands wrote:
Your question, as given unambiguously in the subject line, relates to
2.6.0. I'm telling you, equally unambiguously, that you don't
want to do
that. You might need to start off with an older binary to get
yourself
going, or you might be able to get hold of a binary for
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
Is it (already) possible to use Unicodestrings for file paths?
Only if your current ansi code page supports the characters used in the
unicodestring. There are not unicodestring overloads yet in the RTL.
I think Joerg means something else. The
On 05/09/2012 01:06 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
There are no binaries provided by my distribution. It's Slackware!
But the
question was, was it really necessary to use such a recent glibc?
And what, pray, is wrong with Slackware? :-)
Most of the SPARC systems
19 matches
Mail list logo
