>. I think it /should/ work however if you add a "{$if > FPC_FULLVERSION >=
030300}
Oops, sorry, you writed it already: if > FPC_FULLVERSION >= 030300
OK thanks.
Huh, and for:
> if FPC_FULLVERSION >= 030200 (not sure of the number)
>then use pfHidden flag.
Is 030200 the right number?
> Well, nicer would be if you'd do it inside the main for-loop.
Yes, I 100 % agree with that but...
After *lot of* try and *lot of* headaches I give up.
I perfectly understood (I think) your code with filter inside the loop, it
should work but the result is not ok.
There s a strange $self first
Am 28.07.2019 um 16:02 schrieb fredvs:
It's not beautiful if you mean that, but it will work...
OK, I will make it nicer.
Well, nicer would be if you'd do it inside the main for-loop.
Oh and just in case you want more headaches...
Yes, please, I adore it.
By the way, about headache, may I
> It's not beautiful if you mean that, but it will work...
OK, I will make it nicer.
> Oh and just in case you want more headaches...
Yes, please, I adore it.
By the way, about headache, may I ask what number of FPC_FULLVERSION will
be used for that wonderful new feature?
OK, nice fight and
Am 28.07.2019 um 15:10 schrieb fredvs:
I'm no fan of those nested with-blocks
Same for me.
Did you see my fixes, do you agree with it ?
It's not beautiful if you mean that, but it will work...
Oh and just in case you want more headaches: the current code will bomb
on current FPC trunk on
> I'm no fan of those nested with-blocks
Same for me.
Did you see my fixes, do you agree with it ?
Fre;D
-
Many thanks ;-)
--
Sent from: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Am 28.07.2019 um 03:02 schrieb fredvs:
PS: If you know what makes the problems in your code, I am very curious to
know what is the solution.
I'm no fan of those nested with-blocks so I definitely won't try to fix
that code.
Regrds,
Sven
___
