> On Dec 15, 2023, at 8:56 PM, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> What complicates things, is that many conflicting rules have the same name in
> the Language Reference. For example, conceptually we have object-methods,
> record-methods, class-methods, interface-methods and
On 15.12.23 16:00, Martin Frb via fpc-pascal wrote:
[...]
However, a method can be reintroduced, and be virtual/abstract.
type
TFoo = class
procedure Bar; virtual; abstract;
end;
TFoo2 = class(TFoo)
procedure Bar; reintroduce; virtual; abstract;
end;
Can that make
On 15/12/2023 14:56, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal wrote:
I am puzzled by the syntax rule in Chapter 6. Classes of
the FreePascal Language Reference (version 3.2.0)
Section 6.1 Class definitions has
method-definition = [ "CLASS" ] ( function-header |
procedure-header |
I am puzzled by the syntax rule in Chapter 6. Classes of the FreePascal Language
Reference (version 3.2.0)
Section 6.1 Class definitions has
method-definition = [ "CLASS" ] ( function-header | procedure-header | constructor-header |
destructor-header ) ";" [ ( ( ( "virtual" | "dynamic" ) [
Jean SUZINEAU via fpc-pascal wrote:
Le 15/12/2023 à 10:39, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal a écrit :
I don't see a semicolon in the formal syntax.
May be included in the ' "DO" statement ' ?
No, have a look at the syntax diagrams, statements never end with a semicolon.
Regards,
Adriaan van
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
The fact that the semicolon before the else is optional ?
I don't see a semicolon in the formal syntax.
This works:
OK, than an optional semicolon must be added to the rule
exceptionhandlers = [ exception-handler { ";" exception-handler } [ ";"
Le 15/12/2023 à 10:39, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal a écrit :
I don't see a semicolon in the formal syntax.
May be included in the ' "DO" statement ' ?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal wrote:
Note that the same ambiguity exists in the syntax (and
this is less well known)
exceptionhandlers = [ exception-handler { ";"
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal wrote:
Note that the same ambiguity exists in the syntax
(and this is less well known)
exceptionhandlers = [ exception-handler { ";" exception-handler } [
"ELSE" statement-list ] |
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal wrote:
Note that the same ambiguity exists in the syntax (and
this is less well known)
exceptionhandlers = [ exception-handler { ";" exception-handler } [ "ELSE"
statement-list ] | statement-list ] .
exception-handler = "ON" [
Note that the same ambiguity exists in the syntax (and this
is less well known)
exceptionhandlers = [ exception-handler { ";" exception-handler } [ "ELSE" statement-list ] |
statement-list ] .
exception-handler = "ON" [ identifier ":" ] class-type-identifier "DO"
statement .
as ends with
11 matches
Mail list logo
