On 2017-04-20 09:40, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> The people fighting javascript in the browser are fighting a reargard battle.
> It will only get worse.
Indeed, I was simply pointing out that _some_ functionality is possible
without JavaScript, but the majority of what we consider "the standard
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-04-14 12:53, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Why is it scripting needed to display a calendar?
To display a popup menu, for example.
But apparently you don’t need JavaScript for that either. Here is a blog
post (dated 5 years ago) where
On 2017-04-14 12:53, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> Why is it scripting needed to display a calendar?
>
> To display a popup menu, for example.
But apparently you don’t need JavaScript for that either. Here is a blog
post (dated 5 years ago) where the person proved just that - you can use
HTML and
On 14.04.2017 12:56, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Why is it scripting needed to display a calendar?
Most obviously: (OK. I do know that there is a timed reload instruction
in HTML, that I malevolently ignore in this post, but it would be a PITA
to use same in a more complex example, as it would
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Am 2017-04-14 um 11:03 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
>> Am 2017-04-13 um 10:20 schrieb Michael Schnell:
>> > So at the moment HTML5 and Java script is the way to go, but
WebAssembly should recreate
Am 2017-04-14 um 11:03 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
>> Am 2017-04-13 um 10:20 schrieb Michael Schnell:
>> > So at the moment HTML5 and Java script is the way to go, but WebAssembly should
recreate Action Script versatility performance in a more
