On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Stefan V. Pantazi wrote:
Thank you for this, Michael. I think it is wonderful work.
I've done some old tests of the new implementation and it looks very
good. The only failed tests were related to date and time
representation. This appears to be fixed in the new
Thank you for this, Michael. I think it is wonderful work.
I've done some old tests of the new implementation and it looks very
good. The only failed tests were related to date and time
representation. This appears to be fixed in the new version. Most
importantly, I see no memory leaks when
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Benito van der Zander wrote:
Hi,
Useful if you want to process large amounts of JSON data
without building the whole JSON document in memory.
I have always used jsonscanner for that...
Well, JSONScanner does not do structural JSON validation.
JSONReader does.
Hello,
I have changed the JSON parser, it is now written on top of a SAX-like JSON
reader (which is available separately). All unit tests work fine, and the
few extra tests which I did also, but I would like to hear if someone has
code that no longer works.
The change is committed in trunk.
