It figures.
I'll have to look at the Frame 11 update once it's available.
Alison
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Rick Quatro
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 5:31 PM
To: 'Robert Lauriston';
How did you update? Via Help Updates or the Adobe Downloads website?
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Ragnar Hanås
Sent: May-06-12 9:02 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Updating FM10
Hello,
I am trying to apply
At 10:32 -0700 3/5/12, meg miranda wrote:
Some of the larger issues I run into all the time:
Big irritation that I have, is that the variables are and have been a struggle
to work with. ... Interleaf used to do such a stand up job with variables.
There speaks a true...
Other features that
On 2012-05-04 01:15, Robert Lauriston wrote:
You should probably post that to the FrameMaker forum topic, I don't
get the impression that anyone from Adobe reads this list:
While I second the suggestion to put the request on the Adobe forum, I'd
like to point out that I have a couple of times
Forgot to add that I am using Windows 7 x 32. I did the update via remote
control of desktop, if that makes a difference?
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Ragnar Hanås
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 3:02 PM
To:
The two aren't exactly integrated, but I've found that RoboHelp 9
works well with FrameMaker 10 source. What problems have you
encountered?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jenny Hecker jenny.hec...@infor.com wrote:
I would love to see a good integration from RoboHelp - FrameMaker in TCS. ..
I've found RoboHelp 9 surprisingly painless for publishing Web help
from FrameMaker 10 source.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:09 PM, jaloren28 for...@adobe.com wrote:
As long as one stays strictly within book-to-PDF only paradigm, FrameMaker
is awesome. The moment you go outside of that FrameMaker
Regarding Dov's response that he doesn't monitor the list, I suggest
that his point was the spelling of his name.
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 13:40:33 -0700
From: Dov Isaacs isa...@adobe.com
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FrameMaker Feature
Some people are looking for a RH to FM workflow (which doesn't exist - it's
strictly FM to RH now)
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston
Sent: May-07-12 12:22 PM
To:
What happens if you run it from the Help Updates menu? Does it think it's
already in place?
BTW - I assume you've got full admin rights to your machine, right?
From: Ragnar Hanås [mailto:ragnar.ha...@betamed.se]
Sent: May-07-12 4:40 PM
To: Jeff Coatsworth; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject:
LOL! Yeah, that'd be gool ol' Dov. :)
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:39 PM, susan.kir...@microchip.com wrote:
Regarding Dov's response that he doesn't monitor the list, I suggest
that his point was the spelling of his name.
--
Bill Swallow
Content Solutions Manager
GlobalScript, a division of
It figures.
I'll have to look at the Frame 11 update once it's available.
Alison
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Rick Quatro
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 5:31 PM
To: 'Robert Lauriston'; framers
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120507/a156a025/attachment.html>
At 10:32 -0700 3/5/12, meg miranda wrote:
>Some of the larger issues I run into all the time:
>
>Big irritation that I have, is that the variables are and have been a struggle
>to work with. ... Interleaf used to do such a stand up job with variables.
There speaks a true...
>Other features
On 2012-05-04 01:15, Robert Lauriston wrote:
> You should probably post that to the FrameMaker forum topic, I don't
> get the impression that anyone from Adobe reads this list:
While I second the suggestion to put the request on the Adobe forum, I'd
like to point out that I have a couple of
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120507/8d31a213/attachment.html>
The two aren't exactly integrated, but I've found that RoboHelp 9
works well with FrameMaker 10 source. What problems have you
encountered?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jenny Hecker wrote:
> I would love to see a good integration from RoboHelp -> FrameMaker in TCS.?..
I've found RoboHelp 9 surprisingly painless for publishing Web help
from FrameMaker 10 source.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:09 PM, jaloren28 wrote:
> As long as one stays strictly within book-to-PDF only paradigm, FrameMaker
> is awesome. The moment you go outside of that FrameMaker becomes very,
Regarding Dov's response that he doesn't monitor the list, I suggest
that his point was the spelling of his name.
>Message: 4
>Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 13:40:33 -0700
>From: Dov Isaacs
>To: "framers at lists.frameusers.com"
>Subject: RE: FrameMaker Feature Requests
>Message-ID:
>Content-Type:
Some people are looking for a RH to FM workflow (which doesn't exist - it's
strictly FM to RH now)
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston
Sent: May-07-12 12:22 PM
To: framers at
---
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120507/73fd1cbb/attachment.html>
LOL! Yeah, that'd be gool ol' Dov. :)
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:39 PM, wrote:
> Regarding Dov's response that he doesn't monitor the list, I suggest
> that his point was the spelling of his name.
--
Bill Swallow
Content Solutions Manager
GlobalScript, a division of LinguaLinx
t;http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120507/893a8a03/attachment.html>
23 matches
Mail list logo
