;
framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Basic question: Book revision best practices
One note:
If needed, I simply rename the output PDF filename if I want to have the
version number in the name.
Doing this breaks inter-document links, if you generated a set of PDFs while
all of their BOOK
One note: If needed, I simply rename the output PDF filename if I want to have the version number in the name.
Doing this breaks inter-document links, if you generated a set of PDFs while all of their BOOK files were open (the easiest way to do it). I firmly advicate naming your BOOK to match
HUGE subject, but I'll just note one element:
Now I want to make changes, so it will become version 1.1. What do best practices say to do? I assume save all content, TOC, and title files as new "v1-1" files. Should I create a new "v1-1" book file into which the v1-1 content goes? Or should the
...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of David Artman
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 1:44 PM
To: Tim Pann; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Basic question: Book revision best practices
HUGE subject, but I'll just note one element:
Now I want to make changes, so
...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Rick Quatro
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 18:15
To: 'Tim Pann'; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Basic question: Book revision best practices
Hi Tim,
I prefer to do my versioning at the folder level. That way
Hi Tim,
I prefer to do my versioning at the folder level. That way, I never have to
rename .book or .fm files. When I am ready for 1.1, I create a folder and
copy all of the 1.0 files to it. You can rename book components and
FrameMaker will resolve cross-references, etc. but I prefer
As others have mentioned, switching to a version control system with revision
history might be a wise choice. It takes a lot of the manual work out of
keeping track of versions. Maintaining a separate folder for each release can
quickly get overwhelming, especially when you have to port changes
Subject: RE: Basic question: Book revision best practices
Hi Tim,
I prefer to do my versioning at the folder level. That way, I never have to
rename .book or .fm files. When I am ready for 1.1, I create a folder and
copy all of the 1.0 files to it. You can rename book components
] On Behalf Of Rick Quatro
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 9:15 AM
To: 'Tim Pann';
framers@lists.frameusers.commailto:framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Basic question: Book revision best practices
Hi Tim,
I prefer to do my versioning at the folder level. That way, I never have to
rename .book
